Clint Eastwood Chrysler Super bowl commercial: Facebook fans respond

If you didn’t see it aired on TV during halftime of the Super bowl Sunday, you’ve likely heard about it by now: The Clint Eastwood Chrysler commercial. Amid all the debate on the ad's perceived political stance, we took this question to our Facebook fans: After watching this video, do you think Chrysler came out with a pro-Obama commercial, or a patriotic commercial? We’ve culled their 127 comments and grouped the best here.

6. Gimme a break, GOP

Holly Hall Wilson It's Chrysler commercial that appeals to patriotic and proud Americans that don't think we're on the fast track to hell. Unfortunately, one political party can't handle a message with such overt optimism being delivered during our current president's term.

Lorne Entress The Republicans only chance at winning back the White House is to paint America as a bleak, failed society. When they see a powerful, hope-filled ad that gives evidence of progress, of people working with their government to make things better, they cry foul. Let's not forget the Republicans primary, self-admitted goal. It's not to work together to make a better country. It's to defeat President Obama.

Carol Ruth Shepherd The GOP is so heavily invested in its own recursive negativity and pessimism it reads any expression of optimism and faith in this great country as socialist Democrat machine propaganda.

Matt Moore Loved the ad. As the good book says, let's forget what lies behind and look forward to what lies ahead. Companies need to advertise, and they used an iconic figure to promote an historic brand in a city that needs all the positive coverage it can get. Conservatives should be the first people to be UN-concerned about how a corporation spends its money.

Ian Colte Patriotic. The only people who think it was pro-Obama are the same people who believe anything that might imply that Obama hasn't destroyed America is a liberal conspiracy. Whacko.

Robert Melusky I thought the Republican response was bizarre but in character with the extreme right shift that is destroying the party. I didn't read it as anything Democratic but a call to action in the tradition of The Greatest Generation. If the Republicans can't get behind that positive message, how will they demonstrate to America any semblance of leadership?

Lee Woodward First impressions are what count. I saw it as an ad which was for being pro American for a car builder who can get its act together design and quality wise and we should be supportive of this renaissance whether it was "bailed out" or not. And I am a strong Conservative Republican. Sorry some always have to get their anti-GOP remarks in no matter what. Given all that, it was not nearly as good of an ad as last year's Chrysler ad, which was considered the best for 2011, but was more product oriented.

6 of 9

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.