Skip to footer

After Kony 2012: Three ways NGOs can work with Africans as equals

As in the Kony 2012 campaign, humanitarianism in Africa gets oversimplified in myriad ways, in the process making Africans themselves one-dimensional and raising up the white Westerner as savior. Here are three ways nongovernmental organizations can work with African citizens as equals.

3. Reject the idea that entire societies are undeveloped or backward

NGO representatives and donors working in Africa should read the literature of the greats (Ngugi wa Thiong’o, Chinua Achebe, Wole Soyinka, as well as many others.) They should understand that African universities are producing their own experts on history, development, public health, social sciences, and numerous other fields.

Westerners need to appreciate African experts' insights on religion, culture, politics, and social issues. Many have been criticizing and satirizing not only their own elites and transnational financial institutions, but also the more naïve NGOs and external “saviors” for some time.

The Kony 2012 campaign exemplifies some of the more lamentable aspects of aid work. But many working in the NGO world are much more reflective, less narcissistic, and more appreciative of the complexities involved in their attempts to make the world a better place. They are not the ones receiving thousands of hits or millions of tweets, but they are the ones who should be emulated.

Cecelia Lynch is a professor of political science and director of International Studies at the University of California, Irvine. She is editor of The CIHA Blog.

3 of 3
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.