Skip to footer

Readers Write: Congress must take unpopular stands, not compromise; Mike McQuery is no victim in Sandusky scandal

Letters to the Editor for the September 3, 2012 weekly print issue: Since when are leaders expected to only do what is easy in the short term? It's a tremendous reach to try and justify what amounts to Mike McQueary's cowardly act by calling him a victim of male culture.

Congress must take unpopular stands

I would like to take exception to the premise of the article "Economy's problem: Congress?" in the July 9 & 16 issue. If I'm understanding the main point correctly, some economists have determined that last year's congressional battle over raising the debt ceiling adversely affected the economy.

My inference from this observation is that members of Congress need to stop taking a stand that is unpopular.

Perhaps parents who insist that their children refrain from spending their days eating candy should likewise abandon their sense of what's right because their position is unpopular and also causes candy companies discomfort.

Since when are leaders expected to only do what is easy in the short term?

In the same article, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D) of Maryland observes that "House Republicans believe that compromise is a dirty word." Apparently he has chosen to ignore the stalemating behavior of Democrats like Senate majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California.

The article also says, "The likelihood is high that the election will come and go without one party taking control of Congress and the White House." I fervently hope this prediction is mistaken.

Carol Cummings

Polson, Mont.

Mike McQueary is no Sandusky victim

In his July 9 & 16 commentary, "Sandusky case: a lesson for parents," Jim Sollisch calls Mike McQueary, former Penn State graduate student and assistant coach, "a victim, too" in the Sandusky child sex abuse scandal.

Mr. Sollisch explains that Mr. McQueary was living out the narrative of the Good Soldier and the Team Player – "the story of loyalty and codes of honor." Sollisch says this figure is one who "takes one for the team."

But this situation wasn't a game; it was a horrible sexual assault on a boy by a full-grown man, witnessed by Sollisch's other "victim," another full grown man. This "victim" fled the area, leaving the boy to Jerry Sandusky. I find it a tremendous reach to try and justify what amounts to a cowardly act.

Police Sgt. Steve Hart

Castle Hills, Texas

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Readers Write: Congress must take unpopular stands, not compromise; Mike McQuery is no victim in Sandusky scandal
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2012/0903/Readers-Write-Congress-must-take-unpopular-stands-not-compromise-Mike-McQuery-is-no-victim-in-Sandusky-scandal
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe