Readers Write: What real US tax reform could look like

Letters to the Editor for the April 8, 2013 weekly print issue: If the US only taxes individuals (not businesses) with a personal income tax and a retail sales tax, the savings to governments, businesses, and families would be enormous. Another idea: Do away with income tax, initiate a three-tier flat tax with no exemptions, and then initiate a national sales tax.

Real tax reform

In the first point of their Feb. 25 commentary, "6 ideas for bipartisan tax reform," Steve Bell and Shai Akabas suggest reducing US corporate income tax rates to 28 percent. If we really want to maximize an economic stimulus program we should eliminate all taxes on business. Businesses simply pass those costs along to consumers, embedded in higher prices – which amounts to a regressive tax on the poor and middle class.

As the largest consumer of goods and services in the country, the federal government is therefore, in essence, the largest taxpayer in the country, followed by state and local governments. So one could argue that the largest reduction we could make to all government budgets and individual costs of living could be to eliminate all taxes on business.

Let's tax only individuals – directly and visibly – with a personal income tax and a retail sales tax. The savings to governments, businesses, and families in both taxes paid and their associated implementation costs would be enormous.

Art Gardner

Goleta, Calif.

The problem with the ideas in this commentary is the lack of any mechanism to keep them in place. Most, if not all, of the loopholes that were closed in the 1986 tax reform were replaced and the rates were raised to higher levels. The problem is the income tax code itself. One of the big reasons lobbyists flock to Washington is to buy "favors" in the tax code.

Here are three alternative ideas for tax reform: Start the process to amend the Constitution to do away with income tax. While that process is taking place, initiate a three-tier flat tax with no exemptions. Once the Constitution has been amended, initiate a national sales tax.

Because raising national sales-tax rates would have an immediate negative impact on consumer spending and therefore economic activity, representatives in Congress would think twice before raising those rates, as opposed to income taxes. And lobbyists would also have no loopholes to buy.

Albert Paparesta

Brookfield, Conn.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers Write: What real US tax reform could look like
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2013/0408/Readers-Write-What-real-US-tax-reform-could-look-like
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe