How 'play ball' can also mean 'play fair'

After Major League Baseball suspended Brewers' star outfielder Ryan Braun for violating drug rules, other MLB players and the players union reacted with surprising support for restoring integrity to pro ball. That's a welcome shift for honest sport.

|
AP Photo
A statue of Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig is displayed outside of Milwaukee's Miller Park where a banner showing Milwaukee Brewers star Ryan Braun hangs. The MLB suspended Braun on Monday for violating its anti-drug program.

On Monday, Major League Baseball suspended a famous player, Ryan Braun of the Milwaukee Brewers, for violating its drug rules. On the face of it, this could be seen as yet another sports star nailed after a probe of possible use of performance-enhancing drugs. But like the game of baseball itself, Mr. Braun’s error led to a surprising result.

The players union, rather than cry foul or criticize the process as it has done in the past, welcomed his punishment. More important, many in professional baseball spoke out about the need for players to rely on their natural abilities to ensure a level playing field for honest competition.

“I’m tired of the steroids,” New York Yankees manager Joe Girardi said after the Braun announcement. “Just do things the right way, bottom line.”

“I think everybody’s frustrated, especially the players,” said Seattle Mariners pitcher Joe Saunders. “We all feel a little bit cheated.”

“The good thing about this is we’re cleaning [up] the game,” said Yankees closer Mariano Rivera. “That’s the way it should be.”

After years of trying to rid baseball of steroids and similar drugs, MLB may finally be rounding third base. The breakthrough started with an MLB investigation of the now-defunct Biogenesis clinic in Florida, which is accused of supplying drugs to a number of players. Yet it is the reaction to the Braun case that suggests a culture shift is already under way among players to maintain each person’s integrity in honoring fairness in the sport.

For all the prods and probes from on high, athletes themselves must bring honesty to the game. Sometimes that happens when a sport’s reputation is brought low after a top player is caught doping. Why bother to watch, fans ask, if a sport is not a true test of ability? Why look up to a star athlete, many kids ask, if so many are caught lying about their drug use?

Braun’s fall is a key moment for pro baseball to rise. He is a five-time All-Star player and former National League MVP who failed a drug test in 2011 but got off on a technicality and then profusely proclaimed his innocence. When confronted with new evidence this year by MLB, he finally admitted, “I have made some mistakes.... I am willing to accept the consequences of those actions.” His suspension runs through the rest of the season, costing him millions of dollars.

This incident is the kind that many institutions, whether in business, education, or government, often use to seek change in the character of all employees. When a cheating scandal strikes a school, for example, new rules and tougher punishments are sometimes seen as not enough. After a case of massive cheating on a test in 2012, Harvard University is trying to address the “broad cultural trends” that led to it and the need for students to work with integrity. If Harvard does adopt its first honor code, “it is critical that students feel ownership” of it, states an academic committee report.

For pro baseball, the Braun affair may be the critical pivot from relying mainly on fear of punishment to a strategy in which the players embrace integrity out of respect for the game, the fans, and for themselves. For the national pastime, that’s the future.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How 'play ball' can also mean 'play fair'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2013/0724/How-play-ball-can-also-mean-play-fair
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe