In Ukraine, a vote to turn foe into friend

After winning Ukraine's presidential election, Petro Poroshenko sets his first priority: reaching out to separatists. Nations in civil conflict need a healer who can calm the fears of those in rebellion.

|
Reuters
Petro Poroshenko speaks in Kiev after winning Ukraine's presidential election on Sunday. He said he he would not negotiate with armed separatists in the Russian-speaking east but was open to dialog with people there with grievances, provided they rejected violence.

Petro Poroshenko, a.k.a. the “Chocolate King” of Ukraine, certainly has plenty on his platter after handily winning Sunday’s election for president. Activists want more anti-corruption laws. A huge government debt threatens economic reforms. Russia growls about his pro-Europe stance.

So what does this billionaire businessman, the only Ukrainian tycoon to support last fall’s protests in Kiev, choose as his top priority?

The new president says he will first travel to the eastern region known as Donbass and talk to people who either did not vote for him or could not vote because of civil conflict there. Mr. Poroshenko does not seek to crush the separatists in the Russian-speaking areas. Rather, he wants to ease their fear of political domination by the majority in the west who speak Ukrainian.

In other words, rather than gloat with triumphalism after his strong victory, Poroshenko has adopted a humble approach. His magnanimity in reaching out to those who oppose him has the potential to heal a fractured nation and eventually unify it.

Not many countries are able to hold elections during a civil conflict. Yet Ukraine has now done so, much like the United States did during its Civil War. In his second inaugural address in 1865, Abraham Lincoln sought to reconcile the North and South by reminding them to act “with malice toward none, with charity for all.” Only then could the US “achieve and cherish a just and a lasting peace.”

Achieving peace in Ukraine will not mean forgiving the separatists who have killed civilians, Poroshenko said Sunday. Indeed, Ukrainian troops launched air attacks Monday against pro-Russia rebels who took the Donetsk airport by force. But he did promise to grant an amnesty for rebels who hand over their guns.

Such an approach toward reconciliation hints that he may also seek to dampen the intense political rivalries that have damaged Ukraine’s democracy since independence in 1991. Much of that rivalry has been driven by oligarchs – including himself – in a contest over control of government favors. To set a new example, Poroshenko says he will relinquish control of his confectionery business. He also plans to end a system that has provided “corrupt benefits” to oligarchs and their families. This would be one of many reforms that the Ukraine is already making – including a plan to decentralize power to the regions – that will help unify the country.

Poroshenko also hopes to reconcile Ukraine’s drive to join the European Union with Russia’s strong interest in a Ukraine that does not upset the current geopolitical balance with Europe. This task will surely test his well-honed negotiating skills, perhaps even more so than talks with the separatists.

As elections results came in Sunday, Poroshenko seemed more pleased with the record voter turnout than his own victory. The turnout shows that Ukrainians are ready for a stable democracy, one governed by modesty instead of weaponry.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In Ukraine, a vote to turn foe into friend
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2014/0526/In-Ukraine-a-vote-to-turn-foe-into-friend
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe