Politics: ceiling unlimited

Hillary Clinton will be judged on her merits, not her gender. But if she’s elected US president it will represent an historic moment.

|
Julie Jacobson/AP
Two attendees hug each other at the start of a presidential primary election night rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton June 7 in New York.

Eight years ago Barack Obama became the first African-American nominee of a major US political party. In July Hillary Clinton will become the first woman to be nominated by a major US party.

Whether Mrs. Clinton can break an even bigger historical barrier – and become the first woman president – remains to be seen. Her challenges in the next few months differ in important ways from those facing Mr. Obama in 2008.

Then the young Illinois senator could run a campaign of “hope and change” – presenting himself as a Washington outsider who offered a fresh start.

Clinton can’t play that role. Her strengths (and weaknesses) both stem from her long career in public service and include inevitable second-guessing about choices she has made. She has already tried once for the presidency in 2008 and was defeated by Obama. (She then pledged her support to him and served as his secretary of State.)

Now she will campaign for the nation’s top office again.

Her primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and presumed Republican nominee Donald Trump have won enthusiastic followings by vowing to shake up the status quo. A Clinton presidency would represent a third consecutive term for one political party (in this case the Democrats). In the last half century voters have left a party in the Oval Office for more than two terms only once (Republican Ronald Reagan followed by Republican George H.W. Bush).

While older women (and men) may be in awe of the prospect of the first woman US president – just as older African-Americans were in awe of Obama’s accomplishment – younger women today seem to be saying “no big deal. We see no glass ceiling.”

But 96 years after women first won the right to vote in the United States a woman has yet to hold its highest office. And although roughly half of voters are women, they make up only 20 percent of those elected to Congress.

The world already has seen a woman prime minister, Golda Meir, bring Israel through the 1973 Yom Kippur War. In the 1980s Margaret Thatcher, Britain’s “Iron Lady,” enacted tough economic reforms and led her country to victory in the Falklands War. Indira Gandhi holds the title of the first woman to be prime minister of India, the world’s largest democracy (1.25 billion people).

Today German Chancellor Angela Merkel plays a pivotal role in the future of the European Union. And countries from Liberia to Lithuania, Brazil to Bangladesh, are headed by women.

The US is a latecomer in this arena. In November voters won’t be making a decision based on gender but on who is best suited for the office. But should they choose Clinton in 2016, as they did Obama in 2008, it will represent an equally significant historical landmark.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Politics: ceiling unlimited
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2016/0608/Politics-ceiling-unlimited
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe