How not to see red in green energy

To prevent local harm, Chile pauses a project to produce hydrogen from renewable energy, a signal of caring for the booming global industry in renewables.

|
Reuters
A Hyundai Xcient truck, fueled by hydrogen, stands at a filing station in Berlin, Germany, Jan. 11.

For decades, climate change activists have called on governments, consumers, and industries to move away from fossil fuels to save the planet. That transition has finally reached a watershed. Global investment in renewable energies reached parity with capital for hydrocarbons in 2022 and is poised to blow past it, according to BloombergNEF.

In crossing that threshold, the world may now be focusing more on the quality of “green” energy projects. Do they cause other environmental harm? Do they upset local communities? A good example of this focus is a decision in Chile to hit the pause button on a massive project to produce hydrogen as a fuel by relying on renewable energy.

Hydrogen is the post-carbon dream fuel. It has the potential of powering long-haul land, sea, and air transportation, solving the limitations of electric vehicles while emitting only water in its use. Although global investments in hydrogen accounted for only a small fraction of the $1.1 trillion put into renewables last year, hydrogen is the world’s fast-growing part of the energy sector.

To be commercially viable, however, the cost of producing hydrogen needs to drop. And for the fuel to be called “green,” or climate friendly, the power source must be fully renewable. Last week, the European Union, which has allocated $5.2 billion for hydrogen projects, sought a way around that limitation by designating nuclear power an acceptable source.

Few countries are better endowed than Chile in tapping renewable energy sources. The country’s southern landscape is sparsely populated and buffeted by near-constant winds. The government promises to become one of the world’s top hydrogen exporters by 2040. It already has 41 green hydrogen projects underway, including a $74 million pilot that makes synthetic gasoline from hydrogen with a single wind turbine. The plant’s foreign investors are planning a second, larger operation.

But the project is on hold to address local concerns. Environmentalists worry about the impact of more wind turbines and busier shipping lanes. Residents have raised concerns about Indigenous land rights and the cohesion of their communities. “We realized there was still more dialogue to be had” with residents and officials, Clara Bowman, chief operations officer at HIF Global LLC, the project’s lead developer, told Bloomberg.

Solving climate change, notes Terry Yosie, former president and CEO of the Washington-based World Environment Center, poses societal challenges at least as large as economic ones. That is also an opportunity. “Whether for selfish or moral reasons,” he wrote in Greenbiz in December, “the greater mobilization of coalitions that can yield climate progress is an essential reaffirmation of our common humanity and the ability of people to govern themselves.”

Managing the green transition means not repeating the kind of mistakes that led to global warming: a low regard for others living on Earth. On Chile’s windy southern pampas, a pause in pursuing renewable energy shows a new emphasis on the bonds of a caring society.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How not to see red in green energy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2023/0222/How-not-to-see-red-in-green-energy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe