American politics at its best

Beyond the national divisions of the presidential race, civility and neighborly trust largely rein in local government.

|
AP
Elections officials process mail-in ballots in Maricopa County, Arizona, Oct. 23.

The world will be watching next week’s presidential election in the United States for clues on the health of American democracy. A better measure might be community pancake breakfasts.

That’s because the way Americans view politics and each other changes in meaningful ways closer to home. “The good news is we’re much less ideologically polarized than we think,” notes Rachel Kleinfeld, a senior scholar on democracy at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“When you look at how people feel about their politics in terms of can they have agency, can they get things done, local politics is really where it’s at, and that agency matters,” she told “You Might Be Right,” a podcast of the University of Tennessee, last month.

The discrepancy of faith in democracy between the national and community levels is striking. Almost 60% of Americans worry the Nov. 5 election will be tainted by fraud, an NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found earlier this month. A separate survey by the Bipartisan Policy Center, however, found that 74% of Americans are confident that their votes will be counted accurately in their own community.

While voters express exhaustion with national politics, they thrive on local political competition. Contested mayoral elections in small towns consistently draw some of the highest levels of voter participation in the country, according to a paper published last month in the journal Urban Affairs Review. In Michigan, a state that may help decide who wins the presidency, a study by the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan this month found that civic trust in local institutions outpaces confidence in most state or national institutions.

These indicators reflect what Cindy Black, executive director of Fix Democracy First in Seattle, sees as a “democracy renaissance.” Across the country, a widening network of civil society groups is tapping into new civic enthusiasm, particularly among younger people. They hold community fundraisers to support college scholarships, rally neighbors to protect local environments, and work with local officials to protect voting access.

“Despite what is going on I am very optimistic, because I see more groups and community leaders talking to each other than they had before,” Ms. Black told Danielle Allen, a Harvard professor.

Such goodwill and civility at the grassroots may be having an upward influence. In Johnson County, Kansas, for example, Republican and Democratic candidates for state offices feel voters pulling them back toward the center. “People are tired of the vitriol,” Karen Thurlow, a Democrat seeking a seat in the state Senate, told The Beacon, a local newspaper.

Since May, Republican Gov. Spencer Cox of Utah has urged a similar theme through the National Governors Association, asking his colleagues from both parties to uphold election results and recognize the humanity and decency of their political opponents.

“The survival of constitutional democracy depends on people learning to practice democracy at the grassroots level,” Professor Allen wrote recently in The Washington Post. “This entails committing to the rule of law, to constitutionalism, to nonviolence, to inclusion, and to taking responsibility for the health of our communities.”

Pancake breakfasts may capture what polls cannot. Where Americans live and mingle, partisan divides still yield to neighborly care.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to American politics at its best
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2024/1029/American-politics-at-its-best
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe