Lab results raise question: Do we need oil if we have natural gas?

Researchers say they've unlocked the chemistry that could help gas beat oil as a cheaper source for liquid fuels and 'commodity' chemicals used to make plastics and other products.

|
Jim Urquhart/Reuters
A man fills his truck with compressed natural gas at a filling station in Salt Lake City in 2013. Natural gas could unseat petroleum as the most widely used transportation fuel in the future, thanks to a new method for converting methane, ethane, and propane into alcohols.

Researchers say they have uncovered a way to convert key compounds in natural gas to alcohols for use in industry and transportation far more cheaply than current approaches, raising the possibility that gas could unseat petroleum as the primary source for fuel or chemicals used to produce materials such as plastics.

The results so far represent a proof of principle, cautions Roy Periana, a chemist at the Scripps Research Institute in Jupiter, Fla, who leads the team working on the approach. Additional science questions must be answered and some basic development work done to set up a workbench-scale prototype that engineers could evaluate for commercial potential.

But the science hurdles remaining are much lower than the one the team had to clear to demonstrate its approach, Dr. Periana says.

"This is a scientific breakthrough," says Daniel Resasco, a University of Oklahoma chemical engineering professor, who was not a member of the research team. However, he, too, cautions that much more work needs to be done to see if the approach the team used is commercially viable.

If it is viable, it could have a profound effect on boosting the value of natural gas, which the United States is producing in prodigious amounts since the advent of hydraulic fracturing, which uses high-pressure fluids to shatter gas-bearing rock formations and release gas that otherwise might be unrecoverable.

Already, the low price of gas has stimulated a shift from oil to gas for petrochemicals, says Eric Potter, program director for energy research at the Texas state Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin.

"One of the impacts of having a low price and big supply is that suddenly the petrochemical industry is saying: Whoa! Maybe we ought to stop going to the refinery gates and go to the natural gas processing gates for what we need," he says.

At the same time, he adds, expanded drilling in other proven shale-gas "plays" is on hold because the price of gas is so low. One such area is the Haynesville shale formation that underlies southwestern Arkansas, northeastern Texas, and northwestern Louisiana.

"There is a lot of capacity that can be brought into production if the price goes up," Mr. Potter says. "If something like this adds value to natural gas, the price would go up – up to a certain point."

Any increases would affect the relative advantage that oil and gas would have as feedstock for chemicals and fuels, he adds.

For now, however, the main focus is on the science and what remains to be done to test the commercial viability of the approach Periana's team has uncovered.

The challenge is about breaking bonds – carbon-hydrogen bonds. Carbon and hydrogen make up methane and other hydrocarbons found in natural gas. These additional hydrocarbons include ethane, propane, and butane, among others.

The carbon-hydrogen bonds are quite strong. This strength accounts for natural gas's long-term stability in underground reservoirs; it doesn't react with its surroundings. But that strength also requires a lot of energy to overcome it when trying to convert these hydrocarbons, known as alkanes, into their corresponding forms of alcohol.

Current techniques for producing these occur at temperatures as high as 900 degrees C (1,652 degrees F.). Indeed, since the 1930s and ’40s, high-temperature processes have been used to turn the components of natural gas into an intermediate form of gas known as syngas. Syngas is then used to make methanol or diesel fuel, Periana explains.

But this is a complex, multistep process that takes place in commercial plants costing billions of dollars, he continues. "The capital costs contribute 70 percent of the overall cost of a product" from the facilities, he says.

In principle, if facilities could convert alkanes at low temperatures, even at room temperature, and especially if the processing could occur in one step, the capital costs for exploiting the widest possible uses for natural gas would plummet.

Until now, he says, "no science existed to do that."

Periana, who has been working on the low-temperature conversion of natural gas for 25 years, initially explored the use of expensive, exotic metals as catalysts. This approach required the use of powerful, concentrated acids to convert the alkanes to chemicals and fuels once the catalysts had done their work in lowering the energy needed to break the carbon-hydrogen bonds. This splitting of carbon from hydrogen took place at 180 degrees C, but the work wasn't commercially viable, he says. Among other things, the approach didn't work well at converting the higher-value alkanes in gas – ethane and propane. And it would have been difficult to use the intense acids in a commercial setting.

In a paper published Friday in the journal Science, Periana and his colleagues describe their new approach to converting methane, ethane, and propane in natural gas at a temperature of 180 degrees C. They use less expensive, relatively more abundant metals such as lead and thallium as catalysts, and substantially weaker acids. They found that the approach works well at converting all the alkanes of interest into an alcohol/acid solvent from which methanol, ethanol, ethylene glycol, and other alcohols would be purified.

Although the results represent a significant breakthrough, Dr. Resasco of the University of Oklahoma says he's interested in seeing a second piece of the process fall into place. Periana and colleagues have demonstrated an ability to convert the alkanes, he says. But team also needs to regenerate the catalysts to show a complete "catalytic cycle." 

The team has demonstrated the first part of the cycle, he says, adding, "We're keeping our eyes open to see the other shoe fall."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Lab results raise question: Do we need oil if we have natural gas?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2014/0314/Lab-results-raise-question-Do-we-need-oil-if-we-have-natural-gas
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe