Why don't we do it in the road?

|
Melanie Stetson Freeman/CSM/FILE
Pedestrians and cars mix on New York's Broadway street.

The New York Times ran a provocative story yesterday on redefining the street. Writer Jeff Byles interviewed a number of urban planners who want to diminish the dominance of cars transform the streets into pedestrian-and-bike-friendly public plazas.

"For decades, the Department of Transportation's job has been to move vehicles as quickly as possible," said Janette Sadik-Khan, the agency's commissioner. "We're taking a look at it a little bit differently now. There is a tremendous hunger for what we can do to make it easier for people to get around, to improve the quality of our streets and plazas, to make it easier for people to linger."
These street reformers – planners, architects and urban officials from around the globe – are questioning the conventional street-curb-sidewalk motif, challenging the dominance of cars, and devising ways to use street furniture, plants and even radical new vehicles to transform the experience of the street.

Byles then goes on to describe ten different ways in which the streets can be reworked to tame traffic. Some of these proposals already exist in some places, such as the fun-to-say woonerf, an anarchic Dutch street design that eliminates all traffic signals but gives pedestrians priority, and the separated bike lane, already in place in some parts of Manhattan, which frees cyclists from having to compete with cars for space on the road. Other ideas are more out there, such as Mitchell Joachim's vision of AI-equipped squishy cars.

The story came the day before Michael Bloomberg's much-touted congestion pricing plan imploded in the state legislature. The New York mayor's failure to get Albany on board with his plan will mean that Mr. Bloomberg, if he really wants to reduce city traffic, will be seeking alternatives that don't require approval from the state. I woonerf he has any ideas.

This is important stuff when it comes to climate change, as the car accounts for about half of the typical household's carbon emissions. Making cars more fuel-efficient is part of the solution, but we will also need to make our communities more walkable. In the United States, where far too many people can't walk to their local supermarket without crossing an interstate, redefining our roads will prove difficult. Especially since, as the Times pointed out last week, no matter how difficult you make it, some people just like driving.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Why don't we do it in the road?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Bright-Green/2008/0407/why-dont-we-do-it-in-the-road
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us