5 new ways Obama could jumpstart clean energy

President Obama can push clean energy forward without the need for congressional action, Cunningham writes. A new report lists over 200 recommendations for executive action on clean energy and energy efficiency.

|
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters/File
President Obama listens to engineer Rod Washington as he tours Vacon, a company that manufactures AC drives, during a visit to Raleigh, N.C., in January. A new report provides some clues to what the Obama administration might be thinking as it tries to implement the President’s Climate Action Plan.

A group of energy experts released a thick report that details a laundry list of ways that the President can take executive action to push clean energy forward without the need for congressional action. Led by former Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, the report published by the Center for the New Energy Economy (CNEE) was inspired by a meeting Ritter had with President Obama and other clean energy leaders last year, in which the President solicited advice on how he could lawfully accelerate the deployment of clean energy. Ritter’s document, “Powering Forward,” lays out over 200 recommendations.

The recommendations fall into five categories: energy efficiency; cleantech finance; natural gas production; integrating clean energy into the grid; and alternative fuels and vehicles.

The recommendations vary from the not-very-new (use federal procurement to purchase energy efficient goods and services), the vague (streamline regulatory process X to speed up deployment of Y), and the all too often recommendation that calls for a new report that will issue future recommendations. (Related article: Harvard Research Team has Breakthrough on Battery Storage

However, there are a bunch of interesting ideas as well.

•    For example, the report suggests modifying mortgage rules such that qualifying for federally backed mortgage loans would require new homes be constructed with updated energy efficiency standards. 
•    Gov. Ritter’s report argues that there are significant environmental benefits of increased natural gas production, but calls for a national methane leak-reduction strategy in order to reduce emissions in the drilling process. Such a strategy would be spearheaded by the White House in collaboration with the states in order to “reach an agreement on guidelines that indicate a ceiling on the amount of methane that can be released from the natural gas value chain while retaining the resource’s advantages over coal and oil in regard to greenhouse gas emissions.”  
•    While light on some detail, the report suggests the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issue new regulations that incorporate the administration’s objectives on greenhouse gases. For example, FERC could approve premiums for return on investment rates for transmission projects to those that meet clean energy and climate goals. 
•    Ensuring grid reliability while integrating clean energy is a hot topic in energy circles these days, with many predicting the declining importance of the centralized utility in the coming years. The CNEE report tries to strike a balance, arguing that utilities are key to a “21st Century electricity grid,” but that they need to evolve to incorporate more distributed generation. In this regard, the report believes the Tennessee Valley Authority – a corporation owned by the government – can act as a laboratory for the “future of the utility” by transitioning to cleaner energy while decoupling profits from electricity sales. 
•    Finally, on alternative fuels, CNEE calls on the White House to develop clear national objectives, which prioritize performance over fuel-specific policies. This would seem to hint at overhauling policies of the recent past like the renewable fuels standard and since-expired subsidies for ethanol.

While there is a lot to the 200-plus page document, and many of the recommendations will never be implemented, they do provide some clues to what the administration might be thinking as it tries to implement the President’s Climate Action Plan. Unlike other think-tank documents that often get lost in cyberspace after publication, it appears Ritter’s group had the interest of the President from the outset, and given that the launch event featured Obama’s former climate adviser, Heather Zichal, one can assume the report is being widely read inside the White House.

Original article: http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Renewable-Energy/Energy-Experts-Call-for-Executive-Action-on-Clean-Energy.html

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 5 new ways Obama could jumpstart clean energy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2014/0122/5-new-ways-Obama-could-jumpstart-clean-energy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe