Skip to footer

With oil prices low, refining saves the day for Exxon and Shell

Cheap oil has challenged the oil business, but refining has been a bright spot. That's good news for the likes of Exxon and Shell, whose losses at the well have been offset by strong demand for cheap gasoline and other refined products.

|
Toby Melville/Reuters/File
Shell branding seen at a gas station in London.

The low oil prices that have been dogging the energy industry led to dramatically lower quarterly earnings for Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon Mobil, but the two giant companies did better than analysts had expected. (Related: Key Signals That Oil Prices Are On The Up)

Profits for Shell, Europe’s largest oil company, amounted to $3.2 billion, adjusted for inventory changes and one-time benefits, during the first quarter of 2015. This was 56 percent lower than its earnings in the same period in 2014, the company reported April 30.

On the same day, Exxon, the largest US oil company, said it earned $4.94 billion in the first quarter of this year, down from 9.1 billion a year earlier, a 46 percent drop. It was the weakest first quarter for the oil giant since 2009.

The cause of the declines for both companies was simple: The average global cost of crude oil has plunged by nearly half since late June 2014, bringing with it the price of gas. (Related: We Are Witnessing A Fundamental Change In The Oil Sector)

But both Shell and Exxon outperformed analysts’ expectations for the same reason: There was higher global demand for more affordable oil and increased earnings from refining, which became more profitable because the oil needed for the process was less expensive.

“Refining saved the day for Big Oil,” Fadel Gheit, a senior oil company analyst at Oppenheimer & Company in New York, told The New York Times.

 

While both companies beat analysts’ expectations – Exxon did well enough to increase its dividend by 5.8 percent to 73 cents per share this week – Shell fared somewhat worse. It reported a 53 percent drop in earnings from production to $2.54 billion overall, and lost $1.1 billion on several projects in the Americas.

Making matters worse, it produced an average of only 3.17 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in the first quarter of this year, down by 2 percent from the same period in 2014. Two other European oil giants, Total of France and Britain’s BP, had significant increases in the first quarter. (Related: Low Oil Prices Could Destabilize Financial System)

Shell CEO Ben van Beurden issued a statement that the company is addressing these issues “in what is clearly a difficult industry environment.” He said Shell is “redoubling our efforts to drive a sharper focus on the bottom line.”

In fact, the drive for greater production is a chief reason for Shell’s plans to buy the British energy company BG Group. Shell says it expects the merger will translate into a 20 percent increase in production once the sale closes in early 2016.

While all energy companies have been cutting costs to cope with low oil prices, Exxon’s efforts evidently have paid off better than others’. Last month it said it would reduce capital spending to $34 billion, a reduction of fully 12 percent. This reflects what Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson said at a Houston conference on April 21, that he expects low oil prices are “going to be with us for a while.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Original story: http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Refining-Saves-The-Day-For-Exxon-and-Shell.html

Source: http://oilprice.com/

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to With oil prices low, refining saves the day for Exxon and Shell
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2015/0504/With-oil-prices-low-refining-saves-the-day-for-Exxon-and-Shell
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe