Energy secretary seeks to lock in free speech for DOE scientists

The new policy, which Ernest Moniz says was in the works before Donald Trump won the presidency, says scientists 'are free and encouraged to share their scientific findings and views.'

|
Yu-Ning Aileen Chuang, Medill News Service
Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, speaking Wednesday at the National Press Club, announced new rules aimed at securing scientific integrity for agency scientists.

Outgoing Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz says the department’s new policy protecting staff scientists and engineers as well as scientists who receive federal funding from political interference was in the works before Donald Trump won the presidency.

The policy, which Secretary Moniz unveiled Wednesday at the National Press Club, covers “all scientists, engineers, or others supported by DOE.” The previous scientific integrity policy, introduced in 2012, only applied to Department of Energy (DOE) employees, but not to researchers at the agency’s 17 national laboratories.

The new policy says the scientists and engineers “are free and encouraged to share their scientific findings and views,” including through the media, public forums, and social media.

The previous scientific integrity policy required them to get approval before talking to the press.

“We need correct answers, not convenient answers,” Moniz wrote on the agency’s website.

President-elect Trump has denied scientists’ conclusion that human factors are a major factor in climate change. Separately, his nominee to succeed Moniz, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, once said he wanted to abolish the Energy Department.

Trump’s transition team sent the agency a questionnaire to identify employees and contractors who had attended meetings related to climate change, but Moniz refused and the plan was killed after widespread criticism from watchdog organizations and environmental advocates.

“DOE officials should not and will not ask scientists to tailor their work to any particular conclusions,” Moniz said.

He said the refusal to hand over names of those career scientists “should be viewed as a favor” to the new energy secretary.

He denied the policy update was a response to Trump’s election.

“I wish we had gotten this [new scientific-integrity policy] out earlier as we had planned, to be honest, because we started at least a year ago, long before the election. Before the candidates were known,” Moniz said.

The new regulations also require the next energy secretary to appoint an independent Scientific Integrity Official to handle complaints related to scientific integrity within the agency.

This article was produced in collaboration with Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Energy secretary seeks to lock in free speech for DOE scientists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Inhabit/2017/0112/Energy-secretary-seeks-to-lock-in-free-speech-for-DOE-scientists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe