2017
June
06
Tuesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

June 06, 2017
Loading the player...

Parsing the morality of leaking top-secret information isn’t easy. The latest example: a classified National Security Agency report on evidence of Russian hacking of the US elections was leaked to a news outlet. The leaker broke US law, and violated security clearance and a national trust. That individual could face serving as many as 10 years in prison.

Of course, when President Trump reportedly leaked classified information to Russian officials about a potential terrorist attack using laptop computers, that was also controversial. But it was his prerogative as commander in chief.

Both leaks could be described as morally wrong or morally defensible. But only one leaker faces prosecution.

Still, there’s another aspect of Monday’s NSA leak worth noting. The NSA report states that the 2016 cybersecurity breach was conducted by the GRU, a Russian military intelligence outfit. That means that it could be classified as a military attack, say cybersecurity experts.

For editors and citizens, the temptation is to focus on the politics of Washington leaks or “witch hunts” or possible collusion with Russia. But the outcome is still likely to be a weakening of voters’ confidence in the US electoral system. If the NSA report is true, this was a Russian attack on democracy. Perhaps a more relevant, if less scintillating question may be, How will the United States prevent such attacks in the next election?


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today's stories

And why we wrote them

How should tech companies, such as Facebook and Google, respond to terrorists using their platforms to spread hate, recruit, and teach people how to commit attacks? The solution may not be as simple is it appears.

Overlooked

Stories you may have missed

When looking at conflict in the Middle East, often you'll see the rift between Sunnis and Shiites shaping events. The latest example is in southern Syria – and could put US soldiers in the sectarian crossfire.

Jacob Turcotte/Staff
Anthony Souffle/Star Tribune/AP
Air-traffic controllers work in the control tower at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in Minneapolis. The Federal Aviation Administration handles an average of 50,000 flights a day and more than 800 million passengers a year. Yet many see the system as being behind the curve technologically, compared with those in other developed nations.

What’s the best path to cheaper, faster, and safer travel? We look at why conservative think tanks and labor unions agree on the same possible solution.

Nikki Haley is the Trump administration’s oxymoron. You know, sort of like jumbo shrimp. But in this case the US ambassador to the UN is the “mainstream maverick.” We look at why her values and approach appear to be out of step with those of her boss.

Ann Hermes/Staff
Coder Michelle Morales (c.) worked with other students on a Youth Media project at The Young Women's Leadership School of Astoria in Astoria, N.Y., in 2015. The all-girls STEM-focused public school was established in 2006. A new study has found that, at the college level, female mentors have helped women pursuing STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) degrees to succeed in completing their programs.

While there are few things that can guarantee success, this next story says there is a path to an ironclad outcome: a mentorship. One-on-one relationships equal more women engineers. Every time.


The Monitor's View

Yet another crisis has struck the Middle East. Four Arab states led by Saudi Arabia have cut ties with Qatar over accusation the tiny Gulf kingdom supports terrorism. The intra-Arab rift comes on top of four armed conflicts in the region, ongoing tensions over Israel and Iran, and struggles against terrorist groups. As these problems pile up, the Middle East is in need of a country that can be a calm center, perhaps even a model and mediator.

Outside powers, such as the United States, often fail in that role. And while young people in the region increasingly seek peace and liberty, their voices are still largely stifled by their rulers. The one Middle East country that has a history of acting as a neutral arbiter with a message of peaceful coexistence is Oman.

This small country, ruled for decades by Sultan Qaboos bin Said al‑Said, certainly has strategic interests to act as a middle man. It borders Saudi Arabia and lies just 35 miles across the Strait of Hormuz from Iran. With much less petroleum wealth than its neighbors, it must welcome trade and ties with countries that are often at odds with one another.

Because of an independent foreign policy, Oman has hosted an Israeli prime minister, helped bring the US and Iran together for talks, and sought peace in the current war in Yemen. It carefully chooses sides, if at all, in Middle East disputes. With this latest crisis between Qatar and other member states of the Gulf Cooperation Council, Oman could play a pivotal role.

Since the 1990s, Oman has been home to a desalination research center that brings Israelis and Arabs together. Its women enjoy more opportunities and freedom than in most other Muslim countries. And no Omani has been convicted of a terrorist crime.

Yet beyond national interests, Oman practices peacemaking because of its dominant brand of Islam called Ibadhi, which straddles the region’s religious divide between the Sunni and Shiite branches. Ibadhi Islam teaches unity and inclusivity among Muslims. In Oman, where the regime controls Islamic institutions, other religions enjoy far more freedom than in neighboring states. Its government is largely nondemocratic yet its society is relatively egalitarian.

All these characteristics have given it respect as a mediator, or at least neutral territory for adversaries to talk. In a region known for its violence and export of terror, such a country should be honored and supported for its ability to see beyond conflicts and to balance interests, opening the possibilities for peace.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

There’s a growing understanding of the importance of love and compassion when it comes to caring for people’s health. Christ Jesus provided a consummate example of the healing power of love. His compassion went deeper than affection or pity. Jesus demonstrated love impelled by God, divine Love itself – and compassion that looked to the deeper need for understanding our true identity as God’s complete, whole, worthy spiritual creation. The result was profound healing. His example was for all time. Following in the path he pointed out can lead us to a higher understanding of health as our divine right. Many are finding today that God truly “heals all your diseases” and “redeems your life from destruction” (Psalms 103:3, 4, New King James Version).


A message of love

Altaf Qadri/AP
Indian children cooled off at a fountain near the India Gate monument in New Delhi today. Extreme, dangerous heat – it has climbed above 116 degrees F. in the city – has contributed to a rise in crop failures, power loss, and a shortage of drinking water.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thank you for reading today. Among the stories we’re working on next: a look at the motivations of leakers and how those shape what they share.

More issues

2017
June
06
Tuesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.