2017
November
29
Wednesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

November 29, 2017
Loading the player...

Few would argue these are hard times for the media. The term “fake news” has become a breezily efficient way to dismiss rigorously reported stories. Its implication of intentional manipulation of facts tarnishes respected news outlets that prize accuracy. Some outlets that don’t hew to high reporting standards gain the same privileges – such as White House press credentials – as those who do.

The vast majority of journalists work honestly to serve readers well. And The Washington Post just set an example for how to help those readers understand what they do, something that could help counter an increasingly toxic attitude toward media.

The Post broke a story earlier this month in which women went on the record about alleged sexual misconduct by Roy Moore, the GOP candidate in Alabama for the US Senate. On Monday, it recounted its careful investigation of an individual's claim that she had a potentially related story for them. The Post ultimately determined the information was aimed at getting them to publish a false report that would undermine their earlier reporting.

The Post’s account resonates with a statement by Louis Brandeis, a Supreme Court justice from 1916 to 1939. “Sunlight,” he wrote, “is the best disinfectant.”

Now to our five stories that look at consistency, accountability, and the broadening of children’s horizons.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

Yuri Gripas/Reuters
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson spoke to members of the media during a briefing at the White House in Washington Nov. 20.

The absence of a consistent message from President Trump and his chief diplomat is causing confusion in the critical US and Russian relationship.

Do Americans have a fundamental right not to be observed? A new case homes in on legal issues that need a fresh look in an age of cellphones and transponders. 

The Fourth Amendment originally only protected "unreasonable" searches of "houses, papers, and effects," but has been expanded to to account for postal communications and telephone conversations, among other things. Now the Supreme Court is considering if and how information transmitted from cellphones to third parties – including internet service providers and social media companies – should receive Fourth Amendment protection as well.
SOURCE:

CTIA, Pew Research Center, Statcounter; Photos: AP

|
Jacob Turcotte and Henry Gass/Staff

Can you insulate an agency from politics – and still hold it politically accountable? Reconciling those two important goals is at stake in the battle over the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

China has a history of manipulating nationalist sentiment in the service of its international interests. But instead of reliably boosting patriotism, the tactic is also spurring cynicism among an increasingly savvy population.

Christa Case Bryant/The Christian Science Monitor
Laura Horwitz (l.) and Adelaide Lancaster founded the nonprofit We Stories in 2015. The group, which has enrolled more than 550 families and has hundreds more on a waiting list, works to expand, in particular, white parents’ understanding of race and racism through children's books.

Books open all sorts of doors for children – including about race. A move to help parents engage with more multicultural literature is creating a natural vehicle for greater understanding and connection. 


The Monitor's View

Nations coming out of dictatorship or civil war sometimes offer forgiveness to past wrongdoers who fess up. For a torn society, a measure of mercy can often heal quicker than harsh justice. South Africa, Sierra Leone, and Tunisia have tried it. Colombia is in the midst of a truth-and-reconciliation process after its long war. Now it may be Zimbabwe’s turn.

After the end of Robert Mugabe’s 37-year rule last week, a new leader offered an unusual and limited pardon on Nov. 28: Those who stole public money and stashed it abroad will be granted amnesty if they return the cash within three months. After that period, said President Emmerson Mnangagwa, the long arm of the law will be visited upon them.

Zimbabweans must come to grips with the troubling aspects of the Mugabe era. Many past wrongs need the bright light of truth and then perhaps some sort of forgiveness.

Mr. Mnangagwa himself is accused of gross human rights violations in the 1980s. He was vice-president under Mugabe but was sidelined and forced to flee the country in early November. After the military eased Mugabe out, Mnangagwa returned and took over.

Mr. Mugabe, despite his age, is being encouraged by religious leaders to admit mistakes. “Zimbabweans are a forgiving lot,” said Bishop Noah Pashapa of the Life and Liberty Church.

The new president’s amnesty move has a very practical purpose. The estimated $2 billion sent abroad by corrupt Zimbabweans might come back and give a needed boost to the economy, which is about half of what it was two decades ago. The country needs cash to build infrastructure for agriculture and mining.

Many countries use amnesties granted in exchange for ill-gotten gains in order to get a quick shot of revenue. They help improve tax compliance, which gives citizens a stake in their government. A one-time forgiveness also sets visible examples of honesty if enough wrongdoers come forward. A recent amnesty in Indonesia netted $367.5 billion that was hidden in offshore accounts. That is equal to about 40 percent of the Indonesian economy.

Mnangagwa’s move hints that he may also be seeking reconciliation with his political opposition. He faces an election next year and, if the process is open and fair, he’ll need to show quick results in reviving the economy. That is easier to do if he can unite the country rather than try to sideline opponents, as both he and Mugabe did in the past. Forgiveness, like that offered to those who have stolen public funds, is a good start in healing Zimbabwe.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

A recent Monitor editorial about the broader implications of giving Saudi women the right to drive inspired today’s contributor to appreciate anew the many women who have worked to overcome limitations. Upon joining an ecumenical group in which she was the only woman, she found direction in the example of this newspaper’s founder, Mary Baker Eddy, who faced many hurdles in a male-dominated society. Mrs. Eddy’s writings make clear that both male and female qualities are God-bestowed, and on completely equal footing. As part of God’s family, everyone is valued and capable, not invisible or inferior – a realization that breaks down barriers.


A message of love

Sergio Perez/Reuters
Travelers in Madrid walk down a taxi lane Nov. 29 during a strike by taxi drivers in protest of what they call unfair competition from ride-hailing services such as Uber and Cabify.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thanks for joining us today. Tomorrow, among other stories, we'll be looking at the National Flood Insurance Program and how this fall's series of hurricanes laid bare its shortcomings. 

Also, a correction: In our report in yesterday’s Daily on coal, the scale for the chart showing global carbon dioxide emissions should be in billions of tons. (That chart has been updated.)  

More issues

2017
November
29
Wednesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.