Skip to footer

Supersonic parachute fails in NASA's 'flying saucer' test

The chute on NASA’s Low Density Supersonic Decelerator failed to properly deploy in a test Monday, sending the experimental lander, intended for use on Mars, crashing into the Pacific.

|
NASA
A helium balloon carrying NASA's saucer-shaped experimental Mars landing system lifts off from a U.S. Navy base in Hawaii for a second test flight.

Sen—After a parachute failure ended the debut test flight of an experimental Mars landing system last year, NASA engineers got to work on a complete redesign, changing the shape of the massive parachute—the largest ever flown—and reinforcing the material so that even if part tore during its supersonic deployment, the rest would remain intact.

But in the end, more work is needed as NASA’s second Low Density Supersonic Decelerator, or LDSD, spacecraft suffered pretty much the same fate as the first. Recovery teams were on hand in the Pacific Ocean west of Hawaii late Monday to fish out the crashed craft from the sea, where it landed after a parachute failure cut its second test flight short.

Like last year, LDSD got off to a great start, its 300- by 400-foot helium balloon inflating as planned to gracefully carry it to an altitude of 120,000 feet above the Pacific Ocean about three hours after launch on Monday from the U.S. Navy Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii.

LDSD then separated so a solid-rocket motor could ignite, catapulting the saucer-shaped vehicle up another 40,000 feet and pushing it along at about four times the speed of sound.

A doughnut-shaped extension ring then inflated, expanding the surface area of the vehicle so that it would experience more friction as it fell through the atmosphere to slow its descent.

But when, seconds later, it was time for parachute deploy, the test took a turn into the unknown.

NASA likes to look at these tests with an optimist’s eye, grateful to have the opportunity to learn what not to do before the system flies on a billion-dollar Mars mission. LDSD is part of a suite of technologies NASA is developing to try to land payloads at least twice as heavy as its one-ton Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars.

“This is exactly why we do tests like this before we send things to Mars, so that we can understand exactly how they work—or don’t work—and we can improve on our designs,” said LDSD engineer Dan Coatta, who was a commentator during NASA TV’s live test coverage.

“When we’re actually ready to send spacecraft to Mars, we know that they are going to work when that big mission is on the line,” he said.

NASA is looking at augmenting the sky-crane landing system that helped guide Curiosity to a smooth touchdown in Gale Crater in August 2012. A rover of identical mass is slated to fly in 2020, but after that NASA is looking at landing a rocket-powered craft that can blast off from the Martian surface to bring samples back to Earth.

Eventually, NASA is looking at landing much heavier payloads on Mars, such as habitats and equipment to support human explorers.

Related Links:

NASA's 'flying saucer' lifts off for Mars landing test flight

Parachute glitch curtails ‘flying saucer’ test flight

NASA testing 'flying saucer' to land heavy payloads on Mars

Original story from Sen. © 2015 Sen TV Limited. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. For more space news visit Sen.com and follow @sen on Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Supersonic parachute fails in NASA's 'flying saucer' test
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0609/Supersonic-parachute-fails-in-NASA-s-flying-saucer-test
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe