How important are warmer seas in the melting of glaciers?

According to a new study focusing on the western Antarctic Peninsula, they are critical. This research feeds into a growing body of evidence underscoring warmer oceans as a primary driver of the world's shrinking glaciers.

|
Mike Meredith/Courtesy of British Antarctic Survey
Ocean samples were collected by the RRS James Clark Ross around the Antarctic Peninsula.

Why are the world’s glaciers melting?

Many would argue the answer is obvious: global warming, driving up the air temperature, causing the ice and snow to liquify. But as a new research paper illustrates, the truth appears to be more complex.

Scientists studying the ice sheet on the western Antarctic Peninsula found a staggering rate of retreat all along the west coast, but the details of the pattern within that analysis led to the conclusion that the primary driver was, in fact, not warmer air temperatures, but warmer oceans. Alongside other research with similar findings, this could have important implications for our understanding, and predictions, of sea-level rise.

“The story they’re telling is consistent with a lot of other lines of evidence,” says Charles Greene, director of the Ocean Resources and Ecosystems Program at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, who was not involved with the research.

“Probably if you’d looked five years ago, people would have said it was all due to atmospheric temperature,” adds Dr. Greene, “but what we’ve really found in recent years to be the driving force are the warm temperatures melting from below.”

This latest paper, to be published Friday in the journal Science, adds yet another layer of evidence in support of the idea that warmer water plays a crucial role. And, for the first time, the researchers have provided evidence that it is the primary driver in their specific region of study: the western Antarctic Peninsula.

The work had its foundation in a study that lead author Alison Cook, then a PhD candidate at Swansea University in Wales, was undertaking as part of a project spearheaded by the United States Geological Survey, called “Coastal-changes and Glaciological Maps of Antarctica,” sifting through images stored at the British Antarctic Survey.

“The most interesting aspect was looking through historical aerial photographs of this beautiful region of Antarctica!” says Dr. Cook. “It became more fascinating as I realized significant changes could be seen between different images, and once these were mapped the patterns became clear.”

Those patterns revealed a 90 percent rate of overall retreat among the glaciers in that region. But upon closer inspection, the pattern was more distinct.

To the north, the glaciers were relatively stable, but as the researchers cast their eye further south along the peninsula, the rates of retreat rose. What the team also noticed was an accelerated rate of glacial retreat since the 1990s.

In seeking an explanation, they compared the photography and satellite data, which had led to their initial conclusions, with sea temperature records. What emerged was a strong correlation between glacial retreat and the ocean temperatures, which became progressively warmer below 330 feet the further south along the peninsula you chose to look.

Moreover, the warm water at mid-depths so prevalent in the southern reaches has shown increasing temperatures since as far back as the 90s, lending further credence to the hypothesis that warmer waters are the primary driver of glacial retreat in the western Antarctic Peninsula.

But what, exactly, is happening?

“When you have a large ice sheet over the continent, and it meets the ocean, it then extends out into the water – but it’s not floating,” explains Dr. Greene. “It’s running aground. It intersects the bottom, something we call the grounding line.”

This part of the ice is called an ice shelf, and because of the topography of the sea floor, there are plenty of gaps, where ocean water fills spaces between the ice and ocean bottom. In this way, when the temperature of that ocean water rises, it melts the ice from below.

This can destabilize the ice, accelerate its seaward travel and prompt more hunks to break off at its outer edge, there to float away as icebergs and melt into the surrounding water.

“As a result of this study, new predictions of sea-level rise from Antarctic Peninsula ice loss will need to incorporate mid-depth ocean warming as the primary driver of glacier change,” says Cook. “This will therefore help to improve predictions of sea-level rise.”

And herein lies the key, in terms of the study’s import, says Greene: It feeds into the growing body of evidence that underscores the importance of ocean warming in the melting of ice shelves.

This matters because ocean warming melts the ice far more quickly than increasing air temperatures. Understanding this allows scientists to better predict the rates of melting, and thereby the likely sea-level rise.

Back in 2007, when the importance of ocean warming on melting ice sheets was little known, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change brought out a report, in which they predicted that by the end of the 21st century, the level of our oceans could rise by up to half a meter.

Greene worries that, should we carry on as we are, this figure could more accurately lie between one and three meters.

“I’m not saying it’s going to happen,” says Greene. “But our understanding has changed, so if we continue with business as usual with regard to greenhouse gas emissions, we could be looking at really catastrophic sea-level rise by the end of the century.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How important are warmer seas in the melting of glaciers?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0714/How-important-are-warmer-seas-in-the-melting-of-glaciers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe