How soaring birds might inspire intelligent, gliding machines

Scientists created a computer model of birds learning to soar in turbulence for insights into how machines might develop that skill, too.

|
Andrew Vaughan/AP
A bald eagle soars over a farm in Sheffield Mills, Nova Scotia.

Sometimes the best inspiration lies in plain view.

High up in the sky some birds appear to fly without flapping their wings, just gliding along. 

They're catching rides on pockets of air, allowing them to soar along without expending much energy. And scientists are studying how these birds learn such sophisticated soaring in search of insights that could revolutionize how machines learn to fly. If the researchers devise algorithms to mimic the birds' ability to learn, drones and other flying vehicles could also become smarter and more nimble.

When a bird like a vulture, eagle, or hawk is gliding along, they simply have to adjust the angle of their wings to catch rising currents of hot air – called thermals – to maintain altitude or soar a little higher.

But this hot air doesn't rise evenly. "There are some parts that are going up, some parts that are going down," and it's not all at the same speed, explains Terrence Sejnowski, a computational neurobiologist at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif. The birds have to compensate for this turbulence to avoid plummeting.

But "conditions can change instantaneously," Dr. Sejnowski tells The Christian Science Monitor. "You can't predict perfectly what's going to happen next." 

With such a plethora of conditions they might encounter, the birds likely haven't experienced every possible condition, and probably lack a preset way to respond to each particular moment of turbulence. So the way they respond has to be generalized, assessing the various different characteristics of the environment and adjusting accordingly.

To learn how to navigate such a dynamic scenario, and determine how to ride, the birds have to calculate a complex set of sensory input. 

Scientists thought the birds might be using the temperature of the rising hot air to figure out how to maneuver their bodies to catch the ride just right. But it turns out that two other sensory inputs are more important. 

How fast the hot air is rising, and the torque – pressure on the birds' bodies to rotate away from an upright position – likely influence what adjustments the birds make most, according to a paper published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

It's been a "complete unknown" how birds learn to soar in turbulence, Douglas Warrick, a biophysicist at Oregon State University who was not part of this study but also studies aerodynamics, tells the Monitor. Anecdotes suggest that juvenile birds have a harder time dealing with the turbulent environment, but "nobody has ever been able to watch young animals, or inexperienced animals, in their first attempts" in a scientific way.

So Sejnowski and his colleagues took a different tactic.

The team created a computer model of the turbulence a gliding bird might encounter and then taught their simulated bird to fly using an algorithm called reinforcement learning. 

All species employ reinforcement learning, says Sejnowski, to learn to navigate their environment based on experience. For example, a juvenile bird might notice that if there's certain degree of torque, a particular adjustment will help keep their bodies upright. In future scenarios, they'll base their response on that experience.

"That's a sophisticated thing to program," Dr. Warrick says. "And this was the first attempt that I've ever seen at getting to the problems of it. I think it's a nice exercise."

For birds, "the key is learning what to ignore," he says. What degree of turbulence can the birds ignore and what do they need to respond to?

"If you watch birds learning to fly in a windy place," Warrick says, "Well, they start out cautiously, that's for sure."

Determining algorithms that mimic birds learning to glide could help scientists create machines that can learn to soar, too. 

One of the challenges with artificial intelligence has been in developing algorithms that can generalize their responses to a variety of scenarios, Sejnowski says. In the past, "they only worked under very specific conditions," he says, "and they failed in the real world because of the complexity of the real world."

But strides are being made. In March, Google's game-playing artificial intelligence program, AlphaGo, defeated the top-ranked human player at the strategy game Go. The feat was accomplished because the Google developers had created AlphaGo to be able to learn how to intuitively pick the optimal moves.

Sejnowski says that his study demonstrates that such learning algorithms that have been employed to solve games can also be used "to solve real world problems that humans and other animals face every day."

One way these algorithms could be applied to real world problems might be to revolutionize drones, Sejnowski says. Right now they are motorized and operated by a human. But if they could be taught to soar like an eagle, taking advantage of the free energy of thermals, drones might be able to be autonomous and use much less energy.

This could be used to improve technologies already in development, like Facebook's solar-powered drone intended to deliver internet to remote areas, Sejnowski points out. If the drone could take advantage of thermals, it could make such a project like that less expensive.

But, "we're talking about a new technology that doesn't exist yet," Sejnowski says. So "you can't predict what the impact is going to be."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How soaring birds might inspire intelligent, gliding machines
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0802/How-soaring-birds-might-inspire-intelligent-gliding-machines
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe