Switching from a Mac to a PC: Five lessons from an Apple fanboy

5. Windows Explorer trumps the Mac Finder (for me, at least)

Microsoft
The Windows 7 taskbar is more versatile than Apple's Finder, giving users options for different websites and software.

Windows Explorer has been perhaps my favorite part of switching. As the core of the computing "experience," it's far more capable than Apple's Finder. Out of the box it includes things like an intuitive search, the ability to assign hotkeys, and tagging support for pictures and Word documents. I've also found that the taskbar functions nicely as both an application launcher and window manager, whereas the Finder's Dock is really only useful as a launcher.

The Windows taskbar also includes some useful features that aren't fully fleshed out in the Finder, such as jump lists (program-specific tasks accessed by right-clicking on an icon in the taskbar), a one-click calendar/analog clock, and thumbnail previews of open windows. Many of the common keyboard shortcuts I'd learned on the Mac are replicated in Windows Explorer, such as Cmd + n to open a new window and Shift + Cmd + n to create a new folder (just replace "Cmd" with "Ctrl" on the PC).

The only Finder feature that I truly miss on the PC is Quick Look, which allows you to preview documents, pictures, videos, and music by pressing the spacebar key. Windows Explorer does include a preview pane that gives you a small thumbnail image of certain media types, but it's hardly a substitute. An add-on program called MaComfort attempts to duplicate the Quick Look functionality, but its preview is also small and fairly limited, and it can't look inside Word documents or other files the way Quick Look can.

Conclusion: Am I glad I switched? Yes. I'm sure I've still got a lot to learn as I continue to adjust to Windows, but so far I've enjoyed the flexibility and relative openness of Windows 7. The overall experience isn't quite as polished and seamless as that of using Mac OS X, but I've found that Windows gives me a little more license to tinker, to customize, to get things working just the way I want them to.

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.