Skip to footer

Switching from a Mac to a PC: Five lessons from an Apple fanboy

The Internet is filled with testimonials of people ditching their PC for a hip new Mac. Where once they trudged through stodgy spreadsheets, they now write screenplays and edit flashy videos (if the ads are to be believed). But there's almost no material documenting the opposite experience. Most of the personal switching-to-Windows stories are many years out of date and center around now-obsolete "But you can't play games and none of your software will work!" arguments.

So, here are the top five things an Apple fanboy learned from two months using Windows.

Microsoft
Tech blogger Jeff Ward-Bailey, highlights the pros – and cons – of abandoning Apple for a PC.

1. Windows has "Mac touches," if you know where to look

Microsoft
With Windows 7, you can easily assign a desktop background with just a few clicks.

  • By Jeff Ward-Bailey

A few months ago, I decided to make the jump to Windows. I'd been using Macs exclusively since 1996, and while I had a passing familiarity with Windows XP from school and work, I'd never had a PC as my main machine. Now, after spending almost two months on an Acer TimelineX laptop running Windows 7 Home Premium, I've gotten a better sense of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Mac and Windows operating systems. And I've learned some things that might help other people who are considering a switch.

There are plenty of user-friendly flourishes built right into Windows 7, including attractive desktop widgets, file previews, assignable media keys, and the ability to quickly "snap" windows to full- or half-screen. During my very first day in Windows, I discovered that I could set a key combination to quickly launch programs I use frequently. (Those combinations can be set through the program's "Properties" pane.) I had a similar setup on my Mac, but a third-party program called Spark had to be running in the background. It was cool to see this feature baked right in to Windows.

My PC experience also dispelled some lingering ill will I'd had toward the Microsoft OS. When I'd used Windows XP before, I always felt that useful settings like monitor resolution and Bluetooth support were either buried deep inside nested menus or placed in locations where you would never think to look. By contrast, things are generally right where I expected them in Windows 7, and it's easy to get to often-used settings. I can change the desktop wallpaper in four clicks: right-click on the desktop, choose "Personalize," click "Desktop background," and make a selection.

Windows 7 also does a good job of letting me know when things are going on, without being intrusive. Automatic backups, for example, run quietly in the background after initial setup. There's no need to bring them to my attention while they're going on. But when a program needs special permission to install, Windows will by default dim the screen and request authorization so I can be sure nothing is installing itself in the background without my knowledge. The notification system strikes me as thoughtful and responsible, without being intrusive.

My Windows experiment has shown me that a lot of the principles of good user interface design are consistent: many elements of window management and application launching are generally the same across the Mac and PC platforms, which certainly eases my transition from the one to the other.

1 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.