Clara Schumann: Five ingredients for a child prodigy (+video)

Google marks the 193rd anniversary of the birth of German pianist and composer Clara Schumann, widely regarded as on of the most gifted musicians of her time. By the age of 11, Schumann was touring internationally, and by 18 was granted Austria's highest musical honor.  

There is no formal definition of "child prodigy," but many psychologists define it as person who, by the age of 10, who can perform a skill at the level of an adult professional. Clara Schumann clearly fits this definition. 

But how did Clara Schumann become a prodigy? What ingredients – external and internal – combined in just the right way to produce her legendary artistry?

Psychology has yet to develop a model that explains why some people can rapidly develop such extraordinary talent – whether it be in art, music, mathematics, or chess – at such an early age. And because prodigies are, by definition, rare, their gifts resist statistical analysis. But research has yielded the emergence of some themes. Here's a list of five traits shared by most child prodigies.  

Google
Google honored Clara Schumann with a doodle Thursday.

1. Working memory

Google
Google honored Clara Schumann with a doodle Thursday.

For all we know, Clara Schumann may have been a genius, but, oddly enough, having a extremely high IQ is not a prerequisite for being a prodigy. A study of eight prominent child prodigies this year found that they scored between 108 and 147 on a Stanford-Binet IQ test. 

Lewis Terman, who invented the test in 1916, defined 'genius' as one who scored above 140, meaning that these prodigies were certainly intelligent, but not extraordinarily so. What the researchers did find extraordinary, however, was that all of the prodigies tested in the 99th percentile in a test of working memory, with six out of eight scoring in the 99.9th percentile.

As the pioneering cognitive scientist George Miller suggested in 1956, most of us are able to hold only seven things in our heads, plus or minus two, at any given moment.  Prodigies apparently can handle quite a bit more than that, at least when it comes to their area of expertise.

Research suggests that they can do so by keeping their long-term memory extremely well organized and accessible to their working memory with shorthand retrieval cues. It's a little bit like repurposing your hard disk space to boost the RAM on your computer, creating a 'virtual memory.'

We can all do this to some extent. While you may have trouble holding in your head a list of, say, ten unrelated words, you'll have no difficulty remembering them if they are arranged into a meaningful sentence.

Clara Schumann, for her part, was among the first concert pianists to perform entirely from memory, having been trained to do so by her father. Nancy Reich, author of "Clara Schumann, The Artist and The Woman," notes that at least one audience member regarded her lack of notes as pretentious, yet discussions of her work always praised her faithfulness to the original score.

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.