Inventions that were going to change the world – but didn’t

3. The Bluetooth Headset

Diether Endlicher/AP/file
The company logo of Nokia Siemens Networks is displayed in front of the headquarters in Munich in this 2007 photo. Nokia Siemens Networks says it will acquire the majority of the Motorola wireless operations in a $1.2 billion deal.

“Wait, are you talking to me or your Bluetooth?” was a common question in the late 1990s, especially in the business world. Bluetooth headsets, the tiny earpieces that connect calls from a phone in your pocket to a radio in your ear, were all the rage, until people realized they make you look a little crazy.

Bluetooth first came about in the early 1990s through a partnership between several major tech companies, such as Nokia and Ericsson, looking for a way to safely share files between devices. They came up with Bluetooth, a chip that connects devices through WPAN (wireless personal area network) and allows the transfer of files, such as documents or ringtones. Soon they realized it could also connect phone calls to wireless headsets the size of a thumb – hence the businesspeople chatting into seemingly thin air.

Though the headsets trended for a few years, they have been declining in popularity since 2009 according to Strategy Analytics, a technology market research group. Why? Fashion. Though some thought headsets would just keep getting smaller, and more inconspicuous, turns out that speaker phone and iPhone headphones worked just as well, and didn’t require a torpedo-shaped earpiece that could only be seen from one side of your head.

Despite the plateauing popularity of headsets, Bluetooth technology is still in most mobile devices today, and does score points for its cool name. Harald Bluetooth was a 10th century Danish king who was famous for uniting several Scandinavian countries for strategic purposes (and snacking on blueberries). Bluetooth engineers likened their mission (bringing together competing tech companies for the greater good of innovation) to this Danish king, and even created their logo after his initials in rune letters “H” and “B."

3 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.