Inventions that were going to change the world – but didn’t

7. The Car Phone

Photo illustration / John Nordell / The Christian Science Monitor / File
Is your phone 10 years old? How about your phone plan? This 11-year-old photo of cell phones highlights how much phones have changed in the past decade.

Moviegoers were stunned when Humphrey Bogart picked up his phone in the 1954 movie “Sabrina” – in his car.

Yes, the car phone was once the height of mobile device technology and has been around far longer than you may think. The first car phone was an 80-pound behemoth installed mostly in military, reporting, and rural vehicles and operated on a small network of telephone poles picking up hexagonal waves, introduced in the early 1940s. But technology quickly advanced, moving phones to high-end cars (hence the Bogart endorsement). Photos from the late 1950s and early 1960s show a rotary-dial phone attached to the dashboard. Though still basic, it felt like something that belonged far in the future.

Then it began to go mainstream. Before 3G and 4G phones, the first 0G network was developed for commercial use in Finland in the early '70s. From there, it grew in popularity around the world and became a staple in limousines and other elite forms of transportation. Through the 1980s and early 1990s, the car phone was seen as a symbol of wealth and power – a way to conduct business while driving your car! – and seemed to offer endless possibilities in the world of telecommunications. So why no phones attached to cars today?

The car phone actually ended up changing the world in a different way: by being the precursor to the cellphone. Phones were pulled off the dashboard, but still used the mobile “G” networks to create the mobile phone network and usher in the cellphone era. By the mid-nineties, phones no longer had to be attached to a car to be mobile. Though, let’s be honest, we’d all attach a rotary phone to our dashboard if it made us look as cool as Humphrey Bogart.

7 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.