Five times Internet activism made a difference

From the Arab Spring to SOPA to #blacklivesmatter, here’s a look at how online activism has impacted social issues across the globe.

3. Taiwan's student protests

Edward Lau/Reuters/File
Police use water cannons to disperse demonstrators as they protest against a trade pact with mainland China, near Taiwan's government headquarters in Taipei on Mar. 24, 2014. Student protesters used an app called FireChat that works without a cell network, allowing users to send messages from one phone to several others within a 30-foot radius.

Beginning in March 2014, student demonstrators in Tapei, Taiwan occupied a parliament building in protest of a controversial trade pact with China. As with similar movements in Egypt and Syria, they worried about the pro-Beijing government’s response, wondering if they would shut off Internet access in a bid to curb the protest.

During the 23-day occupation, they began using a newly-released app called FireChat, which can send messages from one phone to another even without an Internet connection. Using a so-called mesh network, the app works by sending a message from phone to phone until it reaches its destination, meaning that the more people use it, the better it functions.

"We launched FireChat and three days later we saw it become the No. 1 app in Taiwan," Christophe Daligault, head of sales and marketing for Open Garden, the San Francisco-based firm that created the app, told the Monitor in May 2014.

Unlike similar movements in Syria and Egypt, the movement never resulted in a government crackdown on Internet access; the students eventually left the parliament building in March after reaching an agreement with Speaker Wang Jin-pyng that he would not hold a debate on the trade pact until legislation was in place that included broader oversight of all deals with China. But for protesters, the use of FireChat proved to be an invaluable communication tool.

"We were pretty much forced to use it almost at the start of the protests because there were just so many people in the protest areas, it made the cell network so slow," Pamela Lam, a pro-democracy activist who used the tool in what became known as the "Occupy Central" movement in Hong Kong, which followed the student protests, told CNN in October 2014. “FireChat doesn't need data to work -- a lot of people were downloading it.”

In July 2015, FireChat introduced a feature many users clamored for: offline private messaging. That could help solve a problem that plagued protesters in Taiwan and Hong Kong – local police nearby could also detect their movements since they were within the 30-foot radius used by the app. Mesh networks, observers say, could also provide a shelter for protesters concerned about larger social media sites tracking users’ data and possibly turning it over to the government.

[Editor's note: This section has been changed from its original version to clarify the differences between the Taiwan and Hong Kong demonstrations.]

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.