Will fatal Tesla Model S crash put the brakes on self-driving cars?

Federal highway officials are investigating a fatal accident involving a Tesla Model S that was operating in Autopilot mode.

|
Alexandria Sage/Reuters
The interior of a Tesla Model S is shown in autopilot mode in San Francisco. Federal investigators have launched a probe into a fatal crash involving Tesla Model S on autopilot, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced Thursday.

Federal highway officials are investigating a fatal accident involving a Tesla Model S that was operating in Autopilot mode which failed to automatically activate the car's brakes leading it to crash into a tractor trailer.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said it is investigating 25,000 Model S sedans that are equipped with the Autopilot system, which allows for hands-free driving, a feature that has been both admired for its innovation and criticized for being launched too early. If in its investigation the NHTSA finds that the vehicles are unsafe, it could order a recall.

The safety of functions that take some of the control of steering and braking from drivers is a widely discussed topic at a time when many automakers, and other companies, such as Google, are working furiously to build self-driving cars. Some believe that these vehicles will begin appearing on US roads in 2020.

The accident killed the car's 40-year-old driver on May 7, identified as Joshua Brown of Canton, Ohio. Mr. Brown was driving in Williston, Fla., using Tesla's Autopilot feature that was launched in October, when a tractor-trailer made a left turn in front of his car at an intersection, according to preliminary reports from the Florida Highway Patrol.

Tesla, maker of popular luxury electric cars, said in a blog post Thursday that "neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied."

To help keep regulations on pace with innovation, the NHTSA said in December that it's "raising the bar" on its 5-Star Safety Ratings, which appear on the window stickers of new cars. This is meant to encourage development of even more sophisticated safety technologies. The same technologies that will also help make driverless cars possible and safe.

Tesla updated the Autopilot feature in its Model S sedans in January, limiting its hands-free capabilities.

The carmaker restricted the feature on residential roads, or roads without a center divider, so that the car cannot drive faster than the speed limit maximum plus 5 miles per hour.

When Tesla launched Autopilot in October, company founder Elon Musk cautioned that the highly anticipated function was in beta, or test mode, and did not recommend full "hands-off" driving.

"Autopilot is getting better all the time, but it is not perfect and still requires the driver to remain alert," the company said on Thursday. "Nonetheless, when used in conjunction with driver oversight, the data is unequivocal that Autopilot reduces driver workload and results in a statistically significant improvement in safety when compared to purely manual driving."

Despite the promise of better safety, getting drivers used to the idea of giving up control of their cars is one of the biggest barriers to widespread adoption of driverless cars.

According to a recent University of Michigan survey, two-thirds of drivers said they are moderately or very concerned about riding in a self-driving vehicle.

This report uses materials from Reuters and Associated Press.

[Editor's note: An earlier version misstated Mr. Brown's surname in one instance.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will fatal Tesla Model S crash put the brakes on self-driving cars?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0701/Will-fatal-Tesla-Model-S-crash-put-the-brakes-on-self-driving-cars
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe