Renewable energy projects delayed in squabble

Renewable energy projects in California are stalled because of a disagreement between Southern California Edison and federal agencies. Stall is keeping state's national parks and forests from using renewable energy 

|
Steve Marcus/Reuters/File
Lightning strikes over a ridge as a storm passes though Death Valley National Park in California in this 2009 file photo. A renewable energy project at the park has been delayed because of a squabble between Southern California Edison and federal agencies.

A long-running disagreement between federal agencies and Southern California Edison has stalled millions of dollars in renewable energy projects expected to provide power to facilities in California's national parks and forests.

According to the Los Angeles Times, an $800,000 solar project at Death Valley National Park, photovoltaic panels at the visitors center at Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area and a solar power system at the U.S. Forest Service's facility at Mono Lake are among many taxpayer-funded projects that are stalled while federal agencies try to come to an agreement with Edison to tie the projects to the state's electrical grid.

The impasse involves contract restrictions imposed by federal law. Generally federal agencies are not supposed to sign contracts that would leave them liable for unknown future damages because they would be committing money that Congress hasn't allocated.

Other utilities in California, however, have signed similar agreements with the agencies with few problems.

"We think we are close at times, but then nothing," said Jack Williams, who retired this month as the National Park Service's Oakland-based regional facilities manager. "We were successful with PG&E, but with Southern California Edison.... They have been a bit more difficult. We've raised the flag many times."

An Edison spokesman declined to discuss the projects because of the ongoing negotiations. The squabble has captured the attention of Gov. Jerry Brown, whose office is sending the governor's advisor onrenewable energy, Michael Picker, to meet with all the parties in coming weeks to help hammer out differences.

The situation has made it difficult for the parks to meet renewable energy goals at a time when federal agencies are trying to comply with orders to reduce carbon footprints. Moreover, a projected saving of tens of thousands of dollars from utility bills hasn't been realized as the park service and forest service continue to negotiate with the utility.

Parks officials at Death Valley had hoped the newly renovated visitors center would reduce their energy costs by 70 percent. At the Santa Monica Mountains, a solar plant designed has been offline since October 2010.

"It is disappointing to see this big investment sitting idle when we could easily flip the switch and produce benefits," said park superintendent Woody Smeck."We are purchasing electricity from SCE, whereas we could be using renewable energy from the sun and returning power to the grid."

Death Valley National Park superintendent Sarah L. Craighead said their solar projects have been unplugged for more than two years.

"We have been trying to get these agreements in place for quite some time. Everything is just sitting in the queue," she said. "We want to turn these things on."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Renewable energy projects delayed in squabble
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0110/Renewable-energy-projects-delayed-in-squabble
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe