'Billions': Showtime drama will come back for a second season

Showtime's new program will have a second season. How is the cable network doing against such competition as HBO and Starz?

|
Jeff Neumann/Showtime/AP
'Billions' stars Paul Giamatti.

Showtime’s new drama “Billions” will be coming back for a second season. 

“Billions,” which premiered earlier this month, stars Damian Lewis as Bobby Axelrod, who is in charge of a hedge fund, and Paul Giamatti as Chuck Rhoades, who is the U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York. The two are connected by Chuck’s wife, Wendy (Maggie Siff), who works at Bobby’s company.

The program has gotten mixed reviews from critics so far. The first episode of “Billions” debuted online early. 

Showtime’s original programming has become a source of awards season favorites, with shows like “Homeland,” “The Affair,” “Masters of Sex,” and “Shameless” all being nominated for prizes such as the Emmy Awards or the Golden Globe Awards.

How many viewers have been drawn to the cable channel? 

Showtime’s numbers are usually below, for example, those of HBO’s fantasy program “Game of Thrones” and AMC’s show “The Walking Dead,” but then again, there’s not much like “Thrones” or “Walking” on television – the smash hit show “Thrones” has become HBO’s most-watched program of all time. “Walking" also regularly draws massive numbers. (Also, unlike Showtime, AMC doesn’t require a subscription. But the two channels often end up going head-to-head at awards shows.)

So Showtime doesn’t have a big hit that draws stratospheric numbers like HBO or AMC.

“Billions,” however, is doing quite well. According to the network, counting viewers who checked out the pilot early digitally and watched it on TV on its debut date, “Billions” had the highest-rated series debut episode ever for the network. 

However, for subscribers – an important number for HBO and Showtime as well as other subscription cable networks – Showtime fell behind Starz last year. While HBO, Showtime, and Starz all experienced growth, Starz came in at number two ahead of Showtime, with HBO still at number one.

“The margin between Starz and Showtime is small, and it is unclear how long the repositioning of the two networks will last,” Deadline writer Nellie Andreeva noted at the time. “Nevertheless, the quarterly No. 2 finish for Starz is giving a boost of confidence to the pay cable channel which – like HBO, Showtime and now Cinemax – has been beefing up its original series slate.” 

Others feel Showtime needs some course correction. Guardian writer Brian Moylan wrote near the end of last year that “the cable channel lost its way.” 

Moylan pointed to programs like “Dexter,” “Homeland,” “Weeds, and “Nurse Jackie” as hits that made the name of Showtime.

“Then something happened,” Moylan wrote. “’Weeds,’ ‘Dexter,’ and ‘United States of Tara’ came to a close. Homeland hit the creative skids, faltering with critics, and lost all its must-see-TV heat… Shows such as ‘Ray Donovan,’ ‘Shameless,’ ‘Masters of Sex,’ and ‘House of Lies,’ modestly enjoyed by critics and the Emmy voters, weren’t part of the cultural conversation in the way their predecessors were, though they pulled in a decent number of viewers.”

The network’s upcoming “Twin Peaks” continuation could help, says Moylan. But overall, it goes back to having a big hit like "Thrones" – no easy task, or everyone would make one.

“Showtime’s strength is going to be in numbers, creating a beast so big that even lone wolf HBO can’t hunt it as prey,” Moylan wrote.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Billions': Showtime drama will come back for a second season
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0128/Billions-Showtime-drama-will-come-back-for-a-second-season
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe