'Gilmore Girls' revival: Why the show is coming back

Like fan favorites 'The Mindy Project' and 'Family Guy,' 'Gilmore Girls' got enough streaming attention to prove the show's popularity and spark a revival.

|
Mitchell Haddad/The WB
'Gilmore Girls' stars Sean Gunn (l.), Lauren Graham (second from r.) and Alexis Bledel (r.).

The hit 2000s show “Gilmore Girls” will officially be returning for more episodes on Netflix. 

News broke that the streaming service was involved in negotiations with “Gilmore” creator Amy Sherman-Palladino and the series’ stars, Lauren Graham and Alexis Bledel, several months ago.

Now Netflix has confirmed that new episodes of the show are moving forward and that several lead cast members will be returning.

“Gilmore” ran from 2000 to 2007 and starred Graham and Bledel as mother and daughter Lorelai and Rory. The show took place while Rory was in high school and then in college. 

The series also starred Kelly Bishop as Lorelai’s mother, Emily, and Scott Patterson as Lorelai’s love interest, Luke. According to Variety, Bishop, Patterson, and actors including Keiko Agena (Lane, Rory's best friend) and Sean Gunn (Kirk) will return as well.

Sherman-Palladino and her husband Daniel Palladino, who was an executive producer and writer on the original program, are reportedly coming back for these new episodes. 

The revival of “Gilmore” will take the structure of four hour-and-a-half episodes, according to Variety. 

Netflix first released episodes of “Gilmore” on its streaming service in October 2014.

That gave Netflix a way to gauge interest in the show seven years after it went off the air. Viewership for old episodes of the show seem to have been good for the company; Hollywood Reporter writer Lacey Rose writes that “Gilmore” “has been a strong performer for the service.” 

Studying demand by having old episodes stream first has led networks or streaming services to go ahead with new episodes in other cases, too. The Mindy Kaling comedy “The Mindy Project” started life on Fox, and “Mindy” episodes were available on the streaming service Hulu after they aired on TV. When Fox canceled “Mindy” in 2015, Hulu announced it would pick up the show.

“Mindy has always been a beloved member of the Hulu family and we know her millions of fans will be eager to find out what Mindy still has in store for the next chapter,” Hulu said in a statement. “Since its network premiere in 2012, ‘The Mindy Project’ has been a top show on Hulu and has consistently remained popular with Hulu subscribers.” 

This strategy predates streaming, too. Fox canceled its animated sitcom “Family Guy” in 2002 but the show returned in 2005, with credit going to strong ratings for episodes of the show when they aired on Cartoon Network and great DVD sales. Gary Levin of USA Today reported at the time that “it marks the first time a canceled show has been resurrected based on DVD sales.”

A fictional property returning based on fan demand also echoes recent projects like those funded by Kickstarter. A movie based on the mid-2000s TV show “Veronica Mars” was released in theaters after those behind the show set up a Kickstarter. The fundraising tool was also a driving force in the recent revival of the TV show “Mystery Science Theater 3000.”

“If we want a lot more ‘MST3K,’ we need to work together to prove that there's still an audience out there that wants MST3K – and that this isn't all some pitiable delusion – so that we can find a network or online platform who will agree to pick up the show and keep it going … hopefully for another 200+ episodes,” show creator Joel Hodgson wrote on the campaign page

The show has since been funded.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Gilmore Girls' revival: Why the show is coming back
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0203/Gilmore-Girls-revival-Why-the-show-is-coming-back
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe