The Harbaugh way: 4 tips for parenting past sibling rivalry

What better way to get the growing family started on a right direction than taking some lessons from HarBowl 2013? In case you feel the same, I thought I’d share our Top Four Ways to Tackle Sibling Rivalry, courtesy of the Harbaughs.

2. Don't pick sides

Associated Press
When Jim Harbaugh, left, and brother John faced each other in past games, their parents said they didn't even want to attend. Don't pick sides.

And when the kids do have similar needs in a competition, it’s important for parents to stay neutral.

Jack and Jackie Harbaugh, the coaches’ parents, are not saying whom they expect to win next week. And definitely not whom they want to win. Last year, when the 49ers and the Ravens faced off for a Thanksgiving Day game, the Harbaughs reportedly didn’t even want to attend, lest they show an unbecoming display of happiness when one son beat the other.

This goes to the heart of managing sibling rivalry, of course. While there are many cases in which parenting experts say Mom and Dad should intervene – especially when one child is victimizing the other, either physically or verbally – it’s important to do this in a way that does not show favoritism. In their book “Siblings Without Rivalry,” Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish give parents some guidelines for the best ways to intervene. In most situations, they write, parents can do the following: Acknowledge the children’s anger toward each other, listen to each child’s perspective, show appreciation for the difficulty of the problem and have faith that they can work it out. And then leave the room.

Sometimes, of course, a situation is more dangerous, and then a more forceful intervention is necessary. But still, they say, you can send both kids into Time Out and not pick sides. Even with Ray Lewis barreling down.

2 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.