Arkansas representative under fire for rehoming his adopted kids

Arkansas Rep. Justin Harris rehomed two adopted children into the hands of a man who sexually assaulted one of them. Turns out there are few regulations around moving adopted kids to a new home.

|
Danny Johnston/AP
Rep. Justin T. Harris, R-West Fork, walks in the House chamber at the Arkansas state Capitol in Little Rock, Ark., Thursday, Feb. 12, 2015.

An Arkansas case is highlighting the need for more post-adoption support services and regulations. 

Arkansas State representative Justin Harris and his wife, who adopted two girls, ages 6 and 3, in 2013, reportedly “rehomed” them to a man who has since been convicted of raping the older girl. In many states there are no laws against rehoming, or moving, an adoptive child with no vetting process required. 

“The truth will come out,” Mr. Harris said to television reporters this week in response to the allegations.

Eric Cameron Francis was arrested in April 2014 by the Arkansas State Police for the rape of a 6-year-old girl police said was in his temporary care. Mr. Francis was sentenced to 40 years in prison, according to media reports.

The ties between Francis and Harris only emerged in news reports this week. Francis had been employed as head teacher at a Christian preschool owned by Harris and his wife, Marsha.

The Arkansas Times, which originally reported the story, wrote that Harris announced on Twitter and Facebook in March 2013 that he had adopted the girls. Reports state the Harris' gave the girls away, first to Francis and his wife, and then to another unnamed family.  

When an adoptive parent gives their adopted child to another home it is known as “rehoming” according to Amy Webb, a DHS spokesperson who spoke to KATV and said that in Arkansas DHS is aware of nine cases of “rehoming” within the last two years.

Adoptive parents are given hours of training, criminal background checks, and in some cases lengthy trial period, but there are no similar safeguards or processes for children who are rehomed. Rehoming, which is largely unregulated, may be executed by a simple power-of-attorney letter or a notarized statement, according to The American Bar Association.

As a parent, I find it hard to decide which is more disturbing, the fact that children are being rehomed without regulation, or that it takes the rape of a young girl to bring this issue to light. It’s hard to imagine any dedicated parent, adoptive or birth, not cringing at this story.

Friends I know who have adopted children were unsurprised by the news of this case. All had heard about children in the foster care system who became deeply emotionally scarred due to rehoming. One couple I know privately adopted a baby rather than go through the foster care system after learning about rehoming.

In light of what has happened to these little girls it's time for all parents, adoptive and birth, to call upon legislators to start digging into these unregulated rehomings. Animal welfare agencies, such as The Animal Humane Society have stricter adoption rules and post-adoptive guidelines than our nation's child welfare agencies. Does our society care no more for the long-term welfare of adopted children than we do for a stray animal? 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Arkansas representative under fire for rehoming his adopted kids
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/Modern-Parenthood/2015/0306/Arkansas-representative-under-fire-for-rehoming-his-adopted-kids
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe