Journey 2: The Mysterious Island: movie review

( PG ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Michael Caine and Dwayne Johnson bring charm and levity to a predictable and somewhat juvenile 'Journey 2: The Mysterious Island.'

|
Ron Phillips/HONS/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'Journey 2' star Dwayne Johnson (second from right)'s charm can't rescue the film from being predictable.

Director Brad Peyton and writers Brian and Mark Gunn have appropriated "The Mysterious Island" – Jules Verne's sequel to "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" – for a contemporary sequel to the 2008 film version of Verne's utterly unrelated "Journey to the Center of the Earth."

Josh Hutcherson, who played surly 13-year-old Sean in the first film, is the only returnee, this time as a surly 17-year-old Sean. Brendan Fraser, as his uncle, is more or less replaced by Dwayne Johnson, as his new stepdad.

Interpreting a coded radio message and hints gleaned from Verne, Robert Louis Stevenson, and Jonathan Swift, Sean and Stepdad head off for an uncharted island to rescue Grandpa (the always welcome Michael Caine). Along for the ride are Luis Guzmán for comic relief and Vanessa Hudgens for teen romantic interest. 

 Against backgrounds that invoke "Avatar," they fight giant lizards and fly on giant bees, while searching for Captain Nemo's ship. Everything is juvenile (deliberately) and predictable (undeliberately). For all the special effects – like its predecessor, this is in 3-D – the film coasts on Johnson being charming and Caine being Caine. Grade: C (Rated PG for some adventure action and brief, mild language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Journey 2: The Mysterious Island: movie review
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2012/0210/Journey-2-The-Mysterious-Island-movie-review
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe