Oscars 2015: A look at the persistent ‘sameness’ in Academy Award nominees

Of those nominated by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, all the 2014 nominees for best director are white men and all the acting nominees are white. 'I ... look forward to [seeing] a greater cultural diversity among all our nominees in all of our categories,' Cheryl Boone Isaacs, the academy’s first black president, said.

|
Atsushi Nishijima/Paramount Pictures/AP
David Oyelowo with 'Selma' director Ava Duvernay.

On the heels of Oscar nominations, there is always some grumbling. This year the lack of particularly racial diversity in the nominees prompted #OscarsSoWhite to proliferate within minutes across social media. Of those nominated by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, all the 2014 nominees for best director are white men and all the acting nominees – for best actor, best supporting actor, best actress, and best supporting actress – are white. That hasn’t happened since 1998.

Some observers were surprised that this year’s nominees didn’t continue building on the ascent of minorities in Hollywood, beginning with Hattie McDaniel’s historic win in 1939 for “Gone with the Wind” and culminating with last year’s best picture award going to “12 Years a Slave.”

David Oyelowo, who portrayed Martin Luther King Jr. in “Selma,” and “Selma” director Ava DuVernay both ended up on many lists of possible contenders for Oscar nominations. But it wasn’t meant to be. Others have pointed to snubs along gender lines. In addition to only men being nominated for best director, no women were nominated for best adapted screen play, even though “Gone Girl,” by Gillian Flynn, earned critical acclaim.

“In the last two years, we’ve made greater strides than we ever have in the past toward becoming a more diverse and inclusive organization...,” Cheryl Boone Isaacs, the academy’s first black president, told The Associated Press. “I ... look forward to [seeing] a greater cultural diversity among all our nominees in all of our categories.”

But even if the academy seems behind in its recognitions, public opinion is way ahead. Weeks before Lupita Nyong’o took home the best supporting actress trophy for “12 Years a Slave” she gave a speech on being black and feeling beautiful at an Essence magazine award banquet. It became a viral sensation almost overnight.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Oscars 2015: A look at the persistent ‘sameness’ in Academy Award nominees
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2015/0211/Oscars-2015-A-look-at-the-persistent-sameness-in-Academy-Award-nominees
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe