Skip to footer

'X Factor' bucks trend with a judging panel that gets along

'X Factor' revamped its judging panel for its third season, adding Paulina Rubio and Kelly Rowland. 'The X Factor' will start airing a new season in September.

|
Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP
'The X Factor' will be judged by (from l. to r.) Demi Lovato, Simon Cowell, Paulina Rubio, and Kelly Rowland.
  • By Jethro Nededog Reuters

Bucking the usual status quo of hiring contentious divas, Fox's "The X Factor" has assembled a judging panel that actually gets along.

Executive producer and judge Simon Cowell replaced the two seats left vacant by Britney Spears and L.A. Reid after Season 2 with two people he knew had the music chops and would probably get along with him and returning judge Demi Lovato.

"I've wanted to work with Paulina [Rubio] for years and Kelly [Rowland] did the UK show for me and did a brilliant job," Cowell told TheWrap during a press conference at USC's Galen Center in Los Angeles.

"So, it was a very easy decision to put these three together and you hope it's going to work and they're going to get on well. And luckily they did," he continued.

In fact, a show insider told us that the three women get along so well that Cowell can sometimes be excluded from the love fest.

"That's the price you pay," Cowell said when we brought the tidbit up.

"The whole cast this year, there's something really special about it," Lovato explained. "And when we come together I feel it's actually a family, which is actually so rare and I feel like it never happens, especially on these shows."

Lovato declined to compare the chemistry between the current judges with last season's group. Of course, Lovato and Cowell are still up to their playful love-hate antics.

"We have to play referee," said Rowland. "They'll pour water on each other, take each other's microphones..."

In past seasons, Cowell and the show's producers had allowed the various firings and hirings of its judges and hosts to dominate the headlines – by design it felt to some critics.

Yet this season, it announced that host Mario Lopez would be back sans co-host Khloe Kardashian and that it had added Rowland and Rubio with much less fanfare than usual.

Cowell said that he saw Spears and Reid's departures as an opportunity to differentiate "The X Factor" from other TV talent shows.

"I just thought that all these shows were beginning to blur into the same show," he said.

"I think that what we did well last year was, particularly with the groups Fifth Harmony and Emblem3, was to show that on a show like this you can find an artist who can sell records that sell all over the world. That's really the legacy of the show. It's got to be that when you watch a show, you really believe that you're watching a star being found and developed rather than just a winner."

"That's why we're here," Rubio later added, "to make artists that sell millions of albums and stay here for a long time."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to 'X Factor' bucks trend with a judging panel that gets along
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/TV/2013/0723/X-Factor-bucks-trend-with-a-judging-panel-that-gets-along
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe