I plead quilty: Why I inflicted a madcap, modern spin on an old-fashioned art

|
Scott Wilson
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

Once upon a centennial ago, women would gather together around a quilt. I have several quilts in my blanket chest that qualify as genuine antiques, because my mom, who also qualified as a genuine antique, made them. They’re 100 years old. They’re made of faded pastel prints that earned their softness through years of wear on a North Dakota farm. Those prints saw eggs gathered, potatoes peeled, bread kneaded. Outhouses visited, in the snow.

So when my cousin Annie, who lives 100 miles away, proposed a long-distance collaboration, it sounded quaint, and carried a whiff of Mom’s modest grace and virtue. Let others squander their time on their phones: We were going to make art together the old-fashioned way! 

Why We Wrote This

In an era of mass consumption, our writer reminds us of the forgotten art – and underappreciated benefits – of creating something from scratch: connection, fulfillment, and yes, a dash of frustration.

She proposed that we each send the other a colorful block, and we’d add to them in turn, back and forth, until we were satisfied with them. Or they were big enough. Or there was no fixing them.

Creation! Community! Coziness! What could go wrong?

Plenty, it turned out. These are not your grandmother’s quilts.

My cousin Annie and I have been collaborating on quilts for a few years now. It always seems like such a great idea. Old-timey, even.

But we’re modern quilters. We don’t repurpose old clothes; we don’t cut up our wedding dresses. Our artwork isn’t made from what the children grew out of, or the salvageable portions of threadbare calicoes. No ma’am. We are proper consumers. We buy fabric at 14 bucks a yard, and we’re well into three figures by the time the binding goes on.

But time was, women would gather together around a quilt. I have several quilts in my blanket chest that qualify as genuine antiques, because my mom, who also qualified as a genuine antique, made them. They’re 100 years old. They’re made of faded pastel prints that earned their softness through years of wear on a North Dakota farm. Those prints saw eggs gathered, potatoes peeled, bread kneaded. Outhouses visited, in the snow.

Why We Wrote This

In an era of mass consumption, our writer reminds us of the forgotten art – and underappreciated benefits – of creating something from scratch: connection, fulfillment, and yes, a dash of frustration.

So when Annie proposed a long-distance collaboration, it sounded quaint, and carried a whiff of Mom’s modest grace and virtue. Let others squander their time on their phones: We were going to make art together the old-fashioned way! She proposed that we each send the other a colorful block, and we’d add to them in turn, back and forth, until we were satisfied with them. Or they were big enough. Or there was no fixing them.

Creation! Community! Coziness! What could go wrong?

Then I remembered my mom’s wedding-ring quilt. I admired it; I thought it was perfect. She’d pieced the top together, and the quilting of it – the sandwich of batting and backing – was accomplished by hand on a quilting frame. That’s where the other women came into the picture. And my sweet-tempered mom? I can still see that cross look on her face when she pointed out the section Betsy had quilted. “Tsk. Those long stitches!”

Annie and I live 100 miles apart. We slip our quilts in the mule’s saddlebag and send the beast plodding with a slap to the rump. Or we send them through the mail, whichever is faster.

Every time we get our newly expanded quilts, we gasp. “Wow! I would never have thought of that!” we say, which can be interpreted in more than one way. It might be a good thing we’re never in the same city at the same time.

Because we don’t have the same fabric stashes. We don’t even have the same taste in fabric. Annie likes big blue prints. I like small prints in every color that isn’t blue. My favorite blue, in fact, is green. So all our exchanges are a little alarming.

On the other hand, we end up with quilts we never would have made on our own. We are shaken out of our routines and complacency. But I know I have sent off contributions that hit Annie like a sharp yellow dart to the heart. And she has sent me blue puddles of gloom. Everything we add is an attempt to solve whatever the other person did before.

It’s been a fun challenge, though. We each have three pretty quilts out of it. The whole enterprise was going great. Until last year.

I was the one with the bright idea for a new challenge. “How about,” I said, “every time we get the quilt, we have to cut it up in some way before we add to it?”

“Interesting,” Annie made the mistake of saying. And we were off.

What I was visualizing was something almost geological. We’d have artful fractures running through our work, bright mineral fissures, a slab of veined marble in fabric form! Problem: It was scary. Here someone sends you her best artistic effort, and you have to slice it up? Not only that, but once it was cut, it was hard to square things up again.

Our efforts rather quickly went off the rails. It felt like trying to reassemble a whole tomato out of the sauce. By the third addition, we were each in possession of a chaotic, ghastly composition of material that we couldn’t imagine how to correct. There were bizarre geological cracks running through it, all right – and there’s no telling whose faults they were.

But that’s the point: to challenge us. To get us to the sketchy backstreets of our comfort zones. Finally, I punted on Annie’s quilt. There were colors in it found nowhere in nature and they were screaming at each other. I cut the whole thing up into little squares and reassembled them into a staid but well-behaved grid in a neutral sea. It’s not great, but it’s not an assault on the senses.

Meanwhile, Annie had a look at mine. There was a lot going on. There was nothing to do but throw a big river of hand-appliquéd salamanders through the center of it, so that’s what she did.

Now, once again, we both have quilts we would never have made on our own. Surprising! Anything but normal! This was a challenge made. A challenge met.

And a lesson learned: The next one will definitely be normal.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to I plead quilty: Why I inflicted a madcap, modern spin on an old-fashioned art
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/The-Home-Forum/2024/0724/art-quilt-quilting-craft-crafting-sewing-old-fashioned-community
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe