On the rebound after a deeply moving experience.

A household move reminds the Monitor's language columnist how short words can be the most intense.

I've just been through an experience that more than one person has reminded me is considered one of the three most stressful life events. I've just moved.

Just moved house, one might also say. But that's a British idiom that isn't really much used here in the United States.

We use move all the time in any number of senses. We say that traffic is moving, or moving slowly, or not at all. Someone makes his move. Troops are on the move – advancing toward the front line, presumably. We may speak of a person as "on the move" – often to refer to someone's progress professionally, or in some other endeavor.

The International Organization for Migration, an intergovernmental body based in Switzerland, says, "Migration is considered one of the defining global issues of the early twenty-first century, as more and more people are on the move today than at any other point in human history. There are now about 192 million people living outside their place of birth, which is about three per cent of the world's population."

A lot of people on the move, truly, and not always for happy reasons.

We've all been told to "get a move on" – that expression goes back to 1888. More recently, Gomer Pyle's irascible drill instructor used to tell him, "Move it! Move it! Move it!"

Now first lady Michelle Obama is pushing her "Let's Move!" campaign, described as "America's move to raise a healthier generation of kids."

But as a standalone, unmodified intransitive verb, move tends to refer to a change of residence. The "move house" idiom that Americans don't use, they seem not to miss.

Sometimes it's the shortest words that refer to the most intense experiences. Love. Work. Freud's two essentials – both of which are nouns and verbs, by the way. Ditto move.

Moving can indeed be an emotional experience. In fact, the word emotion itself is rooted in the idea of "moving out." It originally (back in the 1570s) referred to social unrest or civil disturbance. By the 1650s, it referred to strong feelings. By the early 19th century, "emotions" were pretty much any old feelings.

We speak of being "deeply moved," after a stirring performance, for instance. That sounds like a truncated kind of idiom, short for an implicit "moved to tears" or some such. But the Online Etymology Dictionary states that this sense of move goes back to 1300 or so. The sense "to prompt or impel toward some action" came in about a hundred years later. The sense of "changing place of residence" didn't come along until 1707. Evidently more people tended to stay put before then. It wasn't so easy in those days just to pack up your treasures in bubble wrap and hit the road.

There's a whole family of "mo" words in English, including move, descended from the Latin movere, meaning to move or to set in motion. Motor, a noun in both English and Latin, is one. Motion is another. Its parliamentary sense goes back earlier (to 1747) than the sense of a wave of the hand ("motioning for the waiter to come over").

I'm contemplating all this now that I'm thick in the Boxes Everywhere phase. Sets of salt and pepper shakers, sugar bowl and cream pitcher, and the like are being liberated from packaging and reunited like refugee families amid the chaos of the international arrivals hall of an airport.

By the way, is there anyone out there who can use some leftover bubble wrap?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to On the rebound after a deeply moving experience.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2012/0614/On-the-rebound-after-a-deeply-moving-experience
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe