As we say, an old standard still holds

A rule we thought would be gone by now, the one about avoiding like in favor of as, proves more durable than expected

|
Stefan Rousseau/AP
Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, speaks about his intention to stand for Parliament at next year's general election.

Editors can be closely enough attuned to language to see it change before their very eyes, even as they are professionally charged with maintaining the status quo of grammar and style – at least until the next edition. 

Oh, the drama of it all! The heartbreak of seeing a hard-won position crumble on the page!

Perhaps a dozen years ago, I harrumphed in-house about the need to hold the line against use of “like” as a conjunction in our published copy. In other words, don’t say, “Like he said, the sky is blue.” Say instead, “As he said, the sky is blue.” Exceptions were to be made for direct quotations, especially from people who don’t consult our stylebook before opening their mouth.

A colleague said he appreciated my efforts but thought the distinction I sought to maintain would be gone within a few years. In my heart of hearts, I had to admit I thought he was probably right. 

Lo, these many years later, I’m not so sure.

Despite many indications of general civilizational collapse all around us, the like/as distinction seems to be holding on better than we might have expected, at least in the world of professionally edited writing. I’ve just done a quick search of “like he said” and “as he said” on Google News. (This was meant to bring up results that have had a little more professional attention than those of a generic Web search.) 

“As he said” creamed “like he said,” with a score of 5,470 to 1,860. And the “like” hits included examples where “as he said” wasn’t an option, such as this, from AllAfrica.com: “ ‘We are still at the stage of stopping the war,’ not trying to hammer out what a transitional government for South Sudan would look like, he said.”

Meanwhile, over on the “as he said” tab of my browser, I find The Standard being maintained by publications as diverse as (1) The Guardian (“[London Mayor Boris] Johnson, asked ... if he had plans to return to the Commons, insisted that, as he said ‘about a billion times,’...”); (2) the Houston Chronicle (“[Jeremy] Lin acknowledged he struggled with the move to come off the Rockets’ bench, but as he said immediately after the season...”); and (3) the splendidly named Lovely County Citizen, which reported on the efforts of local public safety officials to inspect a system of 100-year-old tunnels running beneath the City of Eureka Springs, Ark.: “[A consultant] was to accompany the spelunkers through the tunnels, but realized quickly after entering, as he said, that he is ‘a little larger and a little older than some of those guys.’ ”

So I’m going to declare The Standard holding, at least for now. 

And flooding hazards aside, don’t you want to live in Lovely County? Don’t you want to be that citizen?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to As we say, an old standard still holds
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2014/0828/As-we-say-an-old-standard-still-holds
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe