In heartland of legal marijuana movement, doubts linger, poll suggests

A poll of California voters found that a majority do not want legal marijuana – mirroring the result of Proposition 19 in 2010. Advocates had hoped that views were changing.

|
Stephen Lam/Reuters/File
Mellody Gannon of San Francisco holds a canister of cannabis outside Oaksterdam University as federal agents conduct a raid on the cannabis cultivation college in Oakland, Calif., earlier this year.

A new poll in the heart of the nationwide pro-marijuana movement finds that attitudes have not changed appreciably since California voters defeated a citizen’s initiative to legalize pot in 2010.

The University of Southern California Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll found 46 percent of California voters in favor of “general or recreational use by adults” and 50 percent against. In 2010, Proposition 19 – which would have made California the first state to allow marijuana for casual use – failed with 54 percent against and 46 percent in favor. 

Pro-marijuana activists had hoped that those numbers might have shifted during the past two years. A recent national poll by Rasmussen Reports found that 56 percent of respondents favored legalizing marijuana and regulating it like alcohol and tobacco cigarettes are regulated; 36 percent were opposed. 

The USC poll appears to dash those hopes, though pro-marijuana activists say the numbers reflect fear of marijuana without regulation or rules.

“The word, ‘legalization’ implies a lack of rules, and nowhere in the California poll question is any mention of, or comparison to, a regulatory system,” says Morgan Fox, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project, via e-mail. 

Meanwhile, anti-marijuana groups say they are glad the numbers haven’t budged.

“In all my years of working as a clinician at Scripps, we have yet to see a patient come through who doesn’t attribute his addiction to having started with marijuana as a gateway drug,” says Nancy Knott, a teen drug counselor with Scripps Alcohol and Treatment Center in La Jolla, Calif. “These new statistics are going to be played with and spun until the public simply stands up and says, 'Let’s quit thinking about how to feel good and start thinking about the teenagers who are dying from drug addiction.' ”

The poll also showed that 80 percent of California voters support doctor-recommended use for severe illness. California was the first of 14 states to approve marijuana for medical purposes. But those against it say the law is too lax in regulating the doctors who issue the cards.

“If I had a nickel for every teenager who easily flipped out their medical marijuana card, I would be a rich woman,” says Ms. Knott.

Tod Burke, a professor of Criminal Justice at Radford University in Virginia, says the poll can be read either way.

"Proponents will indicate that almost half of the population supports the legalization of marijuana for 'general or recreational use by adults,' while opponents will note that the majority of the population opposes the measure," he says. Both "will push for their own agenda."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In heartland of legal marijuana movement, doubts linger, poll suggests
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0531/In-heartland-of-legal-marijuana-movement-doubts-linger-poll-suggests
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe