JFK assassination to moonwalk: 6 American conspiracy theories

American conspiracy theories date back to the days before the Declaration of Independence. Here are six – both old and new, well-known and obscure – that are percolating in the American zeitgeist now.

5. 'The Plan' to depose African-American city leaders

Susan Walsh/AP/File
New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu speaks as Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter listens during their talk at the National Press Club in Washington in September.

Is there a secret plan afoot by a white business cabal to remove long-time black leadership from cities with African-American majorities?

Given the recent decision by voters in New Orleans and Detroit to elect white mayors for the first time in decades, rumors of something referred to only as “The Plan” have gained credence in some parts of the black community.

Coined by the Washington Afro American newspaper in 1979, the conspiracy theory posits that cities like Washington, D.C., will eventually vote out historically black mayors, allowing whites to take back major cities from black political control.

As with most conspiracy theories, “The Plan” isn’t completely paranoid. Most large cities have organized groups of business and civic leaders that meet and consolidate power outside the public eye.

But even if “The Plan” seems to be working – even Washington faces the possibility of electing a white mayor for the first time in four decades – there may be nothing nefarious about the pattern.

First of all, many majority-black cities like Atlanta and Philadelphia have shown few signs of abandoning black leadership. Second, demographic changes – specifically, black people abandoning city cores for the suburbs while white empty-nesters and 20- and 30-somethings arrive – have played a large role in shifting voter patterns.

Also, the trend has shown that black voters aren’t necessarily monolithic. In majority-black New Orleans, Mayor Mitch Landrieu was elected in large part because voters trusted him to root out endemic corruption that had seeped into the black power structure.

“Black folks aren’t going to be supporting you just because they’re black,” former Washington Mayor Marion Berry said recently. “They want to get something out of it. That’s called politics.”

5 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.