Net neutrality: five questions after court struck down the rules

The principle of “net neutrality” was struck down by a federal appeals court on Jan. 14. Here’s an explanation of the issues involved.

4. Why are free-speech and consumer advocates crying foul?

Without net neutrality, critics contend, the system could create two kinds of Internet pipelines: one for those who can afford to pay to play and another for the hoi polloi. For example, if Joe in Toledo records a song in his basement and puts it on his site, or even posts it on YouTube, listeners could have to wait a lot longer to stream it than a song from a big corporate-backed band like Metallica, say.

Such a multitiered system would have a profound social impact, critics say. Up to now, the Internet has been a neutral sphere in which every penny-ante start-up, every independent website, and even every aspiring media mogul could be on an even playing pipe with the biggest players in the world. Now, the highest speeds and thus the highest-quality audio and video might be reserved for those who can afford it – creating a cultural echo chamber dominated by big corporations, the critics say.

4 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.