Can University of Oklahoma change its culture?

In the wake of the University of Oklahoma's Sigma Alpha Epsilon closure and two members' expulsion, university students are taking the opportunity to have an open conversation about racism on and off campus. 

|
Sue Ogrocki/AP
University of Oklahoma students march to the now closed Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity house during a rally in reaction to an incident in which members of a fraternity were caught on video chanting a racial slur, in Norman, Okla. Many colleges are clamping down on campus fraternities after their reputations are sullied by race-tainted incidents. Even with a school’s sometimes swift and hard action, episodes such as the racist chants by members of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter at the University of Oklahoma still surface.

After this past week, the campus culture at the University of Oklahoma will likely be forever changed.

The university swiftly closed its Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter and expelled two members after a video featuring brothers singing a racist chant surfaced.

The university's decisiveness stands in contrast to its long history of letting incidents of racism slide. In the past, fraternity brothers have targeted Vietnamese and Native Americans by holding “Mekong Delta” themed parties and defacing tepees. After each show of racism, the fraternities would apologize and promise that it wouldn’t happen again, while the administration would punish those involved and seek to move on.

But this most recent – and highly publicized offense – resulted in more than just a routine apology. It has also given students and faculty opportunity to talk about how they have personally experienced racism.

A meeting about diversity hosted by the university’s business school and scheduled before the SAE incident turned into a discussion among faculty and students about the treatment of minorities on campus.

“This is very different,” Betty Harris, a professor of anthropology, who has taught for 30 years at OU told the LA Times. “There was a habit, or a tendency, to just move past those [other incidents]. But I see something different this time.”

At the meeting, students discussed what it was like to be surrounded by university-sanctioned artwork that upheld racist stereotypes of Native Americans  and never having professors of color. UO student Cheyenne Smith told of being called a racial epithet by a passerby the day the video came out, and Tracey Medina, a Mexican American, recalled her parents calling her after hearing about the video on the news and asking her to "come home, they hate you there," according to the LA Times.

The problem extends far beyond Oklahoma. College students across the country are frequently reported hosting parties with racial themes such as the “Compton Cookout” that mocked Black History Month at UC San Diego and “South of the Border” parties at University of Texas in Austin.

Stephanie Eyocko, a black student at University of Oklahoma, says racism such as this comes from individuals rather than a racist society or institution.

“Let’s not put it off on Greek-ness,” she said of the chant to the LA Times. “The Greek stuff needs to change and the culture needs to change, but individuals need to realize and question when they’re doing something that isn’t safe for black people.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can University of Oklahoma change its culture?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0315/Can-University-of-Oklahoma-change-its-culture
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe