Easing up Environmental Protection Agency regulation of coal-fired power plants would not be as grabby a maneuver as approving the Keystone XL pipeline or embracing the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan. But if Obama were to make moves to ease new regulations on coal-fired plants, it could curry favor in parts of key battleground states – Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Advocates of reduced regulation argue that new federal mandates governing emissions from coal- and oil-fired plants will hurt the US economy as they cause energy prices to rise.
Last December, the EPA unveiled standards to limit mercury and other toxic emissions from the power plants. Supporters of the regulations say that the health benefits reduced air pollution. Opponents say that the rules could force the closure of some plants and threaten the reliability of the nation’s power grid.
On June 20, a Republican-led effort in the Senate failed to gather enough votes to scuttle the new regulations. Obama has touted the new rules, while promising flexibility to protect industry.
But if Obama wanted to ease some of the opposition he faces in coal country, he could take steps to dial back the regulations. That would likely be seen as a desperation move, after billing himself as the “green president.” But if it spells the difference between victory and defeat in Ohio and Virginia, it might be tempting.
