Skip to footer

Mitt Romney vs. Rick Santorum: 7 lessons from Ohio voters

Rick Santorum took the youth vote in Ohio. Catholics broke for Mitt Romney. And Santorum effectively used 'Romneycare' against Romney.

|
(AP Photo/Eric Gay)
Voters cast their ballots in the Republican presidential primary, Tuesday, March 6 in Steubenville, Ohio. Mitt Romney won by a small margin over Rick Santorum.

Exit polls were conducted in a number of Super Tuesday states, but we’re focusing on the Ohio results since it’s such a critical swing state - and one that Republicans almost certainly will need to win in the fall in order to take the White House. So what do the Ohio exit polls show about the candidates’ relative strengths and weaknesses? Read on for Decoder’s top takeaways…

  • No real gender gap: Much has been made about Rick Santorum’s “woman problem” stemming from his conservative positions on social issues like birth control. But in Ohio, Santorum didn’t do that badly with women overall, losing them to Romney by just three points. The one glaring weak spot for him was among single women, who broke for Romney by 17 points. But they only represented 12 percent of the electorate; by contrast, married women, who were 33 percent of the electorate, chose Santorum over Romney by 43 to 39 percent.
  • But a striking age gap: This might be the most interesting result of the night. Young people broke for Santorum yesterday. He won voters in the 17-29 age cohort in Ohio overall, beating Romney by nine points - and even beating out perennial youth favorite Ron Paul. Santorum won the 30-44 age cohort by an even bigger margin, beating Romney by 11 points, and he even squeaked out a single-point win in the 45-64 age group. Romney’s real strength came from the over-65 crowd, where he clobbered Santorum by 16 points.
  • And a big religious divide: Santorum won big among evangelical voters, beating Romney by 17 points. Strikingly, though, he once again lost the Catholic vote to Romney, this time by 13 points (which may still be fallout from his comment that John F. Kennedy’s historic speech about the separation of church and state made him want to “throw up”).
  • Romney voters dislike Santorum; Santorum voters dislike Romney: 61 percent of those who said they would be “dissatisfied” with Santorum as the nominee voted for Romney, while 61 percent of those who would be “dissatisfied” with a Romney nomination voted for Santorum.
  • Santorum’s got stronger “average Joe” appeal: He beat Romney on who “best understands the problems of average Americans” by 12 points.
  • But the income divide among the poorest voters isn’t as big as you’d think: Among voters making less than $50K a year, Santorum only won by 3 points. Where Santorum cleaned up was among voters making $50-99K a year, beating Romney by 11 points. Romney, on the other hand, continued to post strong numbers among voters making more than $100K a year, winning that group by 14 points.
  • The last-minute focus on Romneycare may have given Santorum a boost: Voters who decided “in the last few days” went for Romney by five points, but those who decided on Election Day itself went for Santorum by 13 points. We wonder if there may have also been something of a Rush Limbaugh backlash at work here. 

Like your politics unscrambled? Check out DCDecoder.com

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Mitt Romney vs. Rick Santorum: 7 lessons from Ohio voters
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/From-the-Wires/2012/0308/Mitt-Romney-vs.-Rick-Santorum-7-lessons-from-Ohio-voters
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe