Republicans may think 'blah' about Mitt Romney, but it's his numbers that count

The next big GOP presidential primary is Illinois on Tuesday. Mitt Romney is favored to win the most number of delegates – his likely pattern through April, which could put him ever closer to winning his party's nomination.

|
Jim Young/Reuters
Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney greets diners at a restaurant during a campaign stop in Rosemont, Illinois, Friday, March 16, 2012. Illinois holds its Republican primary election on Tuesday.

A lot of Republican primary voters and caucus goers – those who agree with the recent headline reading “Republicans on the 2012 GOP field: Blah” – no doubt find it hard to accept, but Mitt Romney seems more and more likely to be his party’s presidential nominee.

He keeps winning delegates and endorsements, despite losing or just barely winning contests. He’s got a ton of money to overwhelm his opponents in statewide advertising. And his rhetorical howlers – claiming to be more conservative than Rick Santorum when everybody knows he’s a moderate (you could watch it on YouTube) – have not been politically life-threatening.

Republicans are caucusing in Missouri today, and they will be tomorrow in Puerto Rico. But this coming Tuesday is the biggie: the Illinois primary election.

There’s no guarantee that Romney will win, of course. Barely more than one-third of Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents say they’d vote “enthusiastically” for him in the general election, according to Gallup – a lot fewer than John McCain’s 47 percent level of “enthusiastic” voters in 2008.

But Romney is up more than 6 points in the Real Clear Politics polling average, and Nate Silver of the New York TimesFiveThirtyEight political blog gives him an 86 percent chance of winning. (The Intrade prediction market puts Romney’s chances of winning Illinois at 92 percent.)

Yesterday, Romney won the endorsement of the Chicago Tribune, a major voice in Illinois politics. The newspaper editorialized:

“The United States — its people's sense of normalcy and, more gravely, their future prosperity — is in danger…. Only one of the four Republicans still in this primary race has the personal skill set, the painfully won experience, to appreciate this peril and to guide Americans through their own financial rescue…. For his demonstrated abilities and the economic pragmatism at his core, the Tribune endorses former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts as the Republicans' best, most responsible choice in Tuesday's Illinois primary. The other three contestants, for lack of Romney's credibility on this threat to the American way, can only try to talk a good game. We're far more confident that Romney is the candidate best equipped to keep the U.S. from devolving into New Europe.”

The headline on University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato’s “Crystal Ball” blog reads “Romney Set to Dominate Race Through April.” From now through April, professor Sabato and his colleagues predict, Romney will add 268 delegates to his stable compared to 117 for Santorum. That includes 34 in Illinois (20 for Santorum).

Santorum may dominate in Louisiana (the one southern state during this period) and his home state of Pennsylvania, according to Sabato’s reckoning. But Romney will dominate in Maryland, Wisconsin, Connecticut, New York, and other states and the District of Columbia.

At the moment, according to the Associated Press “delegate tracker,” Romney has 495, Santorum 252, Newt Gingrich 131, and Ron Paul 48. (The first candidate to reach 1,144 delegates will win the Republican nomination.)

“Barring a massive, difficult to fathom shift in this contest, Mitt Romney has a better than 80 percent chance to be the GOP nominee,” Sabato and his colleagues wrote this week. “The reason is that, much like when Hillary Clinton was fighting a front-running Barack Obama in the last few months of the 2008 Democratic primary, the delegate math – and particularly the lack of true winner take all contests – favors the candidate with the big delegate lead.”

As the campaign clock ticks on toward the GOP convention in Tampa, Fla. in August, that looks increasingly to be Mitt Romney.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to  Republicans may think 'blah' about Mitt Romney, but it's his numbers that count
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/President/2012/0317/Republicans-may-think-blah-about-Mitt-Romney-but-it-s-his-numbers-that-count
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe