Open US Senate seats in 2014: seven that are up for grabs now

Here are eight senators who have opted out of a reelection bid in 2014, giving hopefuls in both parties a rare shot at a US Senate seat – and, moreover, one that could flip control of the Senate.

7. Sen. Max Baucus (D) of Montana

Mary F. Calvert/Reuters/File
Sen. Max Baucus (D) of Montana is questioned by media at the Capitol in Washington in this Dec. 31, 2012, file photo. Senator Baucus, chairman of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, surprised colleagues with his decision to not seek reelection to a seventh term next year.

Famously independent, six-term Sen. Max Baucus (D) of Montana has survived and even thrived in an age of intense partisan gridlock, playing key negotiating roles on issues ranging from taxes and trade policy to Medicare, health-care reform, and farm bills.

But with Montana's record of voting Republican in each of the last five presidential races – Obama lost Montana by 13 points in 2012 – Senator Baucus still faced a potentially tough race, likely to include getting hammered over his role in the health-care reform, just as the costs of that program are surfacing.

Still, his decision to retire came as a surprise to colleagues on Capitol Hill. Baucus had amassed a $5 million campaign war chest with, as yet, no announced opponent. Although targeted by Republicans for ouster, he won his last reelection with 73 percent of the vote.

With Baucus out of the race, political analysts ranked the contest a tossup. But with the decision of popular former Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) to opt out of  the race, announced July 13, Republicans have a stronger shot at picking up one of the six seats they are expected to need to take back the Senate . Following the Schweitzer announcement, the Cook Political Report changed its rating for this race from tossup to lean Republican.

"Democrats are now perusing a long list of potential candidates ... but none pack the electoral punch that Schweitzer would have," wrote Charlie Cook.

The field of candidates in both parties is still in flux. On the GOP side, former state Senate minority leader Corey Stapleton and state Rep. Champ Edmunds are in the race, but Republicans are also trying to recruit Rep. Steve Daines, who is the state’s at-large representative in Congress.

So far, all the leading Democratic prospects have declined to run. “Suddenly, Republican prospects look much brighter here than they did when the cycle first started,” concludes the Rothenberg Political Report, which now rates the race “Definitely a race to watch – but put a finger on the scale for the GOP."

7 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.