Protest groups plan new rallies in Ferguson after night of violence

Protest groups, criticizing police response to violence Sunday night at demonstrations commemorating the death of Michael Brown, have planned a new round of rallies for Monday.

|
Jeff Roberson/AP
A protester yells as police form a line across West Florissant Ave., Sunday, in Ferguson, Mo., before shots were fired near the protest. The one-year anniversary of Michael Brown's death in Ferguson began with a march in his honor and ended with a protest that was interrupted by gunfire.

Protest groups have criticized police response to demonstrators who gathered Sunday night to commemorate one year since Michael Brown’s death in Ferguson, Missouri. A new round of rallies, which organizers said were aimed at bringing attention to police violence against racial minorities, are being planned in and around the St. Louis suburb following Sunday’s events.

The anniversary of Mr. Brown’s killing – a shooting at the hands of a white Ferguson police officer that touched off a national debate around race and justice – sparked days of renewed demonstrations that until Sunday had been peaceful and without any arrests. But Sunday night grew violent, when – at the height of what was already a rowdy protest involving rocks and bottles being thrown at officers – gunshots rang out from the area near a strip of stores.

St. Louis County Chief Jon Belmar said it was important to distinguish between those who were exercising their right to protest in Ferguson and those involved in criminal activity, according to The Washington Post.

“There is a small group of people out there that are intent on making sure that we don't have peace that prevails,” Chief Belmar said. “That’s unfortunate. Because even with the folks who were in the street last night, there were a lot of emotions, I get it. But this is something different.”

The eruption of violence in Ferguson comes amid high tensions nationwide between law enforcement and the black community, and as confidence in police dips to its lowest in 22 years, a Gallup poll found in June.  

“While the danger of the job hasn’t subsided, public admiration for police has dropped amid a string of video evidence showing police officers acting with seeming disregard for human life,” The Christian Science Monitor’s Patrik Jonsson wrote.

The Ferguson Action Council, a coalition of local protest organizations, said on Monday that the police should not have sent plainclothes officers without body cameras to an area where protests were being held, according to The New York Times.

“After a year of protest and conversation around police accountability, having plainclothes officers without body cameras and proper identification in the protest setting leaves us with only the officer’s account of the incident, which is clearly problematic,” Kayla Reed, a field organizer with the Organization for Black Struggle, said in a statement.

At a news conference early Monday, Belmar said feuding rival groups may have been the source of the gunfire. At one point, one man crossed the street, apparently spotted the plainclothes officers arriving in an unmarked van with red and blue police lights, and shot into the hood and windshield, Belmar said.

The officers fired back at the suspect, first from inside the van, then on foot when the suspect ran. The suspect again fired on the officers when he became trapped in a fenced-in area, the chief said, and all four officers fired back. He was struck and fell, and later taken to a hospital where Belmar said he was in "critical, unstable" condition.

Authorities didn't immediately release the identities of anyone involved. Tyrone Harris later said the injured suspect was his son, Tyrone Harris Jr., who was released from surgery early Monday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. The elder Harris' claim has not been confirmed. 

None of the officers was seriously injured. All four have been put on standard administrative leave, Belmar said.

At the Fraternal Order of Police’s national conference in Pittsburgh on Monday, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch condemned “the violence against the community, including police officers, in Ferguson,” according to The Washington Post.

“As we have seen over the recent months and years, not only does violence obscure any message of peaceful protest, it places the community, as well as the officers who seek to protect it, in harm’s way,” Ms. Lynch said in a statement. “The weekend’s events were peaceful and promoted a message of reconciliation and healing. But incidents of violence, such as we saw last night, are contrary to both that message, along with everything that all of us, including this group, have worked to achieve over the past year.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Protest groups plan new rallies in Ferguson after night of violence
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0810/Protest-groups-plan-new-rallies-in-Ferguson-after-night-of-violence
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe