Bridgegate: Two Christie aides found guilty of creating epic traffic jam

Two former aides to Gov. Chris Christie were convicted Friday of creating a four-day traffic jam at the George Washington Bridge for what prosecutors say was political revenge.

|
Julio Cortez/AP
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's former deputy chief of staff Bridget Kelly (l.) and Bill Baroni, Mr. Christie's former top appointee at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey entering court in Newark, N.J., on Nov. 3 The two former aides were convicted Friday, Nov. 4, of creating a four-day traffic jam at the George Washington Bridge.

Two former aides to Gov. Chris Christie were convicted Friday of creating an epic traffic jam at the George Washington Bridge for what prosecutors say was political revenge, capping a trial that cast doubt on Mr. Christie's claims he knew nothing about the scheme.

Bridget Kelly, Christie's former deputy chief of staff, and Bill Baroni, a Christie appointee to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, were found guilty of all counts against them. Ms. Kelly cried as the verdict was read; Mr. Baroni showed no emotion. Both defendants announced plans to appeal.

Christie said Friday that the verdict affirmed his decision to terminate Baroni and Kelly and that the jury held them responsible "for their own conduct." He repeated his assertions that he had no knowledge of the plot and said he would "set the record straight" soon about "the lies told by the media and in the courtroom."

"I had no knowledge prior to or during these lane realignments, and had no role in authorizing them," Christie said. "No believable evidence was presented to contradict that fact. Anything said to the contrary over the past six weeks in court is simply untrue."

Prosecutors said Kelly and Baroni plotted with Christie ally David Wildstein to close lanes at the foot of the nation's busiest bridge – a span that connects New Jersey to New York City – and create gridlock in September 2013 to punish the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee for not endorsing Christie for re-election.

Kelly, Baroni and Wildstein all testified that Christie was informed about the lane closings either before or while they were going on.

Baroni's attorney, Michael Baldassare, called the case a disgrace and said the US attorney's office should be "ashamed" of where it drew the line on who to charge.

"They should have had belief in their own case to charge powerful people and they did not," Baldassare said.

US Attorney Paul Fishman said Friday that prosecutors only charged people where they had "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt" to convict.

The federal jury took five days to reach a verdict in the scandal that helped sink Christie's Republican campaign for president. The verdict on charges including conspiracy, misapplying the property of the Port Authority, wire fraud, and deprivation of civil rights came before the judge ruled on a request by defense attorneys to declare a mistrial in the case.

The most serious charges carry up to 20 years in prison. Sentencing was scheduled for Feb. 21.

Democratic state Sen. Loretta Weinberg, who helped lead a legislative effort to investigate the lane closings, said it was a terrible day for New Jersey and "a terrible day to have a spotlight on the kind of administration that was run."

Mr. Wildstein, a high-ranking Port Authority official, pleaded guilty to orchestrating the scheme and was the prosecution's star witness. He faces a maximum of 15 years in prison but is expected to be sentenced to much less. His sentencing hasn't yet been scheduled.

Kelly and Baroni testified they believed the lane closings were part of a legitimate traffic study because, they said, that was what Wildstein told them.

The defense portrayed Wildstein as a liar and a dirty trickster – "the Bernie Madoff of New Jersey politics" – and argued that Christie and his inner circle had thrown Kelly under the bus.

"They want that mother of four to take the fall for them. Cowards. Cowards," Kelly attorney Michael Critchley said in a thundering closing argument.

One of the most damning pieces of evidence was an email in which Kelly wrote: "Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee." Then, as the four days of gridlock unfolded and Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich complained about children unable to get to school, she texted: "Is it wrong that I am smiling?"

On the stand, Kelly explained that she was referring to what she thought was a traffic study and expressing satisfaction that it was going well. As for why Kelly deleted the messages, her lawyer suggested she was afraid she was about to be made the scapegoat.

Wildstein said that Christie was told about the traffic jam as it was happening and that he laughed and sarcastically joked that nothing political was going on when he learned of Sokolich's distress over not getting his calls returned.

But it was not clear from Wildstein's testimony whether Christie knew the bumper-to-bumper mess was manufactured for political reasons. And Kelly testified that she told Christie the lane closings were a traffic study when she informed him of the plans about a month ahead of time.

Siding with prosecutors, US District Judge Susan Wigenton told jurors they didn't have to find that Kelly and Baroni knowingly intended to punish Sokolich in order to convict them of conspiracy.

The gridlock began on the first day of school and held up commuters, school buses and emergency vehicles. Sokolich's pleas went unanswered for four days – on orders from Wildstein, the defendants testified.

At the time, Christie was considered a top GOP presidential contender and was trying to run up a big landslide re-election victory to demonstrate his crossover appeal as a White House candidate.

Christie ultimately dropped out of the presidential race after a poor showing in the New Hampshire primary and said recently that the scandal probably influenced Donald Trump's decision not to pick him as his running mate. Christie is a now a top Trump adviser and has campaigned for him.

Christie was expected to campaign for Trump in battlegrounds Pennsylvania and New Hampshire this weekend. A message left with the Trump campaign Friday wasn't immediately returned.

While the trial did not definitively pin the scheme on Christie, it reinforced his reputation among his critics as a bully, with accounts of profane tirades, threats of bodily harm and tough-guy posturing among the governor and his inner circle that seemed straight out of "The Sopranos."

Christie once threw a water bottle at Kelly in anger, she testified. And Wildstein told the jury that Christie called him "Mr. Wolf," after the character in the movie "Pulp Fiction" who is called in to clean up dead bodies.

According to testimony, Christie's office also used the Port Authority to punish or reward local politicians. Among the goodies the agency dispensed were pieces of steel from the original World Trade Center, destroyed on 9/11.

"These convictions will be an essential defining feature of Christie's legacy in office, and will forever taint how his administration is perceived and will be remembered," Montclair State University political science professor Brigid Callahan Harrison said. "He is damaged by the narcissistic way in which he was portrayed during the trial, a narrative that was accepted by the jury."

Associated Press writers Ula Ilnytzky in Newark and Michael Catalini and Michael R. Sisak in Trenton contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bridgegate: Two Christie aides found guilty of creating epic traffic jam
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/1104/Bridgegate-Two-Christie-aides-found-guilty-of-creating-epic-traffic-jam
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe