NTSB: Asiana pilots to blame for crash in San Francisco

The National Transportation Safety Board highlighted 'mismanagement' by the pilots of the Asiana Airlines Boeing 777 last July. But they also pointed a finger at the aircraft manufacturer.

|
Evan Vucci/AP
Acting National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairman Christopher Hart makes opening remarks during an NTSB hearing to establish the cause of the Asiana Flight 214 airlines crash in San Francisco, and to make safety recommendations, Tuesday, June 24, 2014, in Washington.

Mismanagement by the pilots of Asiana Flight 214, including confusion over whether one of the airliner's key controls was maintaining airspeed, caused the plane to crash while landing in San Francisco last year, the National Transportation Safety Board concluded Tuesday.

But the board also faulted the complexity of the Boeing 777's autothrottle, as well as training materials provided by the aircraft maker that fail to make clear under what conditions the automated system doesn't automatically maintain speed, saying they contributed to the accident.

And the board's acting chairman, Chris Hart, warned that the accident underscores a problem that has long troubled aviation regulators around the globe — that increasingly complicated automated aircraft controls designed to improve safety are also creating new opportunities for error.

The Asiana flight crew "over-relied on automated systems that they did not fully understand," Hart said.

"In their efforts to compensate for the unreliability of human performance, the designers of automated control systems have unwittingly created opportunities for new error types that can be even more serious than those they were seeking to avoid," he said.

The South Korea-based airline's pilot training also was faulted.

The irony of the accident is that it occurred at all. Three experienced pilots were in the cockpit on July 6, 2013. The 777 had one of the best safety records in the industry. And weather conditions that sunny day were near perfect.

But the plane, with 307 people on board, was too low and too slow during the landing attempt. Its tail struck a seawall and was ripped off. The rest of plane went spinning and sliding down the runway.

Despite the violence of the crash, only three people were killed. Two were Chinese teens seated in the back who weren't wearing their seatbelts and were thrown from the plane. Investigators said if they had been wearing the belts they would most likely have survived.

A third teen was hit on the head by one of the plane's doors but survived the crash. She was killed when, lying unconscious, she was run over by two rescue vehicles in the chaos afterward. Nearly 200 people were injured.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to NTSB: Asiana pilots to blame for crash in San Francisco
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0624/NTSB-Asiana-pilots-to-blame-for-crash-in-San-Francisco
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe