Top 4 threats against America: the good and bad news

America’s top spy chiefs and intelligence experts come together every year to share their best guesses about the biggest threats that will face the country in the year ahead. Here are the top four pieces of good and bad news to come out of the annual threat-assessment hearing in Congress Tuesday.

4. Cyberattacks: bad news

Jim Bourg/REUTERS/File
The website of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was unavailable after reports that the website had been attacked in this 2011 photo.

You name it. US intelligence officials have significantly upgraded the threat of cyberattack against key military computer networks and financial systems.

“Cyber threats pose a critical national and economic security concern due to the continued advances in – and growing dependency on – the information technology that underpins nearly all aspects of modern society,” according to the assessment. 

This includes, in particular, “enemies within China and Russia” conducting attacks against US networks and stealing data, according to Mr. Clapper. The assessment warns of an “increased breadth and sophistication” of computer network incursions. 

The assessment cited alarming “intrusions” into Nasdaq and International Monetary Fund networks which “underscore the vulnerability of key sectors of the US and global economy.” The bottom line, according to the assessment, is that “many intrusions into US networks are not being detected.” 

4 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.