Army investigates hundreds for recruiting fraud that cost taxpayers $29m

A 'peer-to-peer' recruiting program that rewarded referrals of new recruits brought in 150,000 soldiers to help fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A Senate panel held hearings into what went wrong.

|
Charlie Riedel/AP
Army recruiter Sgt. Erik Kuerst goes over paperwork with recruit Robert Farris (r.) at the Army Career Center in Sedalia, Mo., Aug 25, 2005.

In the depths of the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – when the US military needed soldiers the most – the Army decided to launch an “innovative” recruiting program.

The idea was to pay a commission, of sorts, for each new recruit that any given soldier referred – a “peer-to-peer” venture, as the Pentagon called it – and it seemed to work: In all, the Army brought in 150,000 new troops for America’s raging wars through the program at a cost of roughly $460 million.

Now, however, hundreds of Army recruiting officers, soldiers, and others are under investigation for racking up fraudulent claims that have cost US taxpayers at least $29 million.

Five soldiers in particular appeared to have racked up roughly $1 million from scams they allegedly hatched using the program as cover.

The program was the subject of a hearing Tuesday on Capitol Hill chaired by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) of Missouri, who called the fraud investigation “one of the largest that the Army has ever conducted, both in terms of the sheer volume of fraud and the number of participants.”

Currently the Army’s Criminal Investigations Division (CID) has initiated 559 criminal investigations involving 1,219 Army officials and soldiers.

The Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee on Financial and Contracting Oversight called top Army brass to deliver their mea culpas Tuesday to lawmakers.

“I want you to know that the accusations of fraud and other potentially criminal actions surrounding the program are as disturbing to us as I know that it is to you,” Lt. Gen. William Grisoli, director of the Army Staff, said in testimony.

Lawmakers, however, didn’t sound so sure about that.

They seized on testimony from Maj. Gen. David Quantock, the Army’s chief law enforcement officer, who acknowledged that only nine cases were investigated between 2007 and 2009.

“That’s a long time when you’ve got fraud going on,” Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R) of New Hampshire observed.

Although the criminal investigations into fraud have involved hundreds of officials, including two major generals and 18 colonels, none have lost benefits or been forced to resign, Maj. Gen. Quantock added.

So what, exactly, went wrong, lawmakers wanted to know.

“In this case, funds were lost due to systematic weaknesses, a general breakdown in sound business processes, and wrongdoing – none of which we will tolerate,” said Lt. Gen. Grisoli, who assured lawmakers that the Pentagon would punish those who have broken the law.

According to written testimony submitted to the committee, one typical scam involved cooperation between recruiters and soldiers. In return for a kickback, a full-time recruiter (who wouldn't normally get any credit under the program since it's his job to recruit) would arrange for a soldier to earn a commission for recruiting a “buddy” the soldier didn’t even know. The two would then cash in on the reward for someone who was recruited outside the program.

As of last month, just over 100 people had been held accountable through courts or administrative action by the Army. It is slow-going, however. Senior Army officials estimate that even preliminary investigations into more than 12,000 recruiters and 94,000 recruiting assistants won’t be completed until at least the fall of 2016.

Striking a somewhat less optimistic note in light of the millions that have been siphoned off by soldiers who may soon walk away unscathed under statute of limitations restrictions, Grisoli added that the Army would also endeavor to “recoup what we can” of the millions of dollars still owed to the US Treasury.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Army investigates hundreds for recruiting fraud that cost taxpayers $29m
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2014/0204/Army-investigates-hundreds-for-recruiting-fraud-that-cost-taxpayers-29m
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe